[Serious Discussion] Religion

[[SAE]Grim]

ORCH OR theory are FACTs.

Somethings not right here.

"Since collapse is ontologically identical with protophenomenal observation (meaning the same thing that occurs in both mental observation and observation by non-mental equipment), how can self-collapse not equal self-observation? Since self-observation is equal to consciousness how is self-collapse ontologically different in any way shape or form from self-observation?"

You're asking questions about things you dont fully understand yourself.
I could be asking questions regarding Einsteins theories aswell to look intelligent, but it doesnt work that way.
I doubt you can answer your own questions tbh.


Anyway, I dont understand how Orch OR has anything to do with God. It's not a scientific theory building up on proving Gods existense or anytihng like that.
It's a theory of consciousness, wich is a normal known term most people know of.

Religious people using science to backup their faith is dumb. It's nothing more than a mis-interpretion, just like alot of other things in religion.

Nowhere does it state that this theory is made to explain God. Religious people using this theory to do so doesn't mean it's correct in any way other than helping your own faith and what u believe in as a person.
It cannot be used to prove anything regarding God, at all.
Everytime you try to use this theory and connect God, you're misinterpreting it and exploiting it.

Not to mention Sir Roger Penrose (It's him and Stuart Hameroff who's behind this theory) is an atheist.
I cant find any personal life info about Stuart but I doubt he continued with this project because he's religious and want to prove God.

If you're gonna answer to this Styla, you must obey to these rules or u will get banned for 2 weeks.

• Use of proper grammar
  
• No internet slangs
  
• No "gg u fail" trolling
  
• Proper use of quotes
  
• Proper use of paragraphs and punctation