06-09-2011, 09:43 PM
oh man what an idiot. u still don't get it. Yes brown is a property of hair, but "self-collapse" is not a "property" of consciousness self-collapse IS consciousness.
u say that a self-collapsing wavefunction in his oscilloscope is not a mind. First of all I'd like to know how u got a self-collapsing wave-function in ur oscilloscope as you need special conditions to get Orch-OR. Secondly, how do u know that it doesn't.
Since collapse is ontologically identical with protophenomenal observation (meaning the same thing that occurs in both mental observation and observation by non-mental equipment), how can self-collapse not equal self-observation? Since self-observation is equal to consciousness how is self-collapse ontologically different in any way shape or form from self-observation?
thanks to Johananratz for answer, master of the theory. he's not just some engineer
ok u dont fail .. notÂ
u say that a self-collapsing wavefunction in his oscilloscope is not a mind. First of all I'd like to know how u got a self-collapsing wave-function in ur oscilloscope as you need special conditions to get Orch-OR. Secondly, how do u know that it doesn't.
Since collapse is ontologically identical with protophenomenal observation (meaning the same thing that occurs in both mental observation and observation by non-mental equipment), how can self-collapse not equal self-observation? Since self-observation is equal to consciousness how is self-collapse ontologically different in any way shape or form from self-observation?
thanks to Johananratz for answer, master of the theory. he's not just some engineer

ok u dont fail .. notÂ
![[Image: tourney-25.png]](http://i295.photobucket.com/albums/mm153/Mark_Vido/tourney-25.png)