(06-06-2011, 05:50 PM)STyL4 link Wrote: you did try to disprove ORCH OR and failed at it, i suggest you to read few pages back.
Also predictions of radio waves? they were stated in "few of predictions in the Bible" at 1 website. it cannot be denied, it is not false interpretation but that was not my main conclusion. i wonder why u didnt comment on others. at first i remember u've stated that they just interpretated what they had seen, if it was like that then the Bible would change ALOT. yes ALOT my boy.
hmm proof? that's what u call it, a false "proof" , what i call it is a reliable conclusion i've stated (that they couldn't just interpretate whatever they had seen, because it was impossible to interpretate something like that back then - " u stated back then that they interpretated whatever they had seen pages back btw", they didn't have submarines, they didn't master chemistry, their history prediction events that happent also couldn't be "piece of cake" ETC. ETC. ETC. so MY POINT WAS that Bible is not just some fairytale as u've mentioned, it is more than that because many Bible events are supported by archeologic founds and known history persons therefore it is more than that and that is a FACT. where in my latest post i mentioned "proofs"?)
after fail attempt to disprove orch or theory.. fail attempt to make a conclusion that Bible is a fairy tale.. after fail attempt to say that they've interpretated whatever they HAD seen.. after fail attempt of your opinions ... pretty much its u who lost, that is what i considered as a conclusion because it's real, my attemps were not fail, ur conclusion / opinion was
I have proved the flaws in your theory every single time
- go read pages back and see my EVERY reply on ur QUOTE about orch or theory, u didn't say nothing back then (u did but i've replied and proved u wrong once again), u stopped talking about ORCH OR theory. that is a fact (won't call it a proof, i know how sensitive u are about it), u've misinterpretated the theory and failed with it.
I disproved orch or long time ago, i suggest you go a few pages back.
to summarize
property of A is B
property of Z is B
thus A=Z
is not valid.
About website proof, yes very valid, not anyone can make a website and just post bullshit on it.
Again, grow up and come with some valid arguments.