(05-19-2011, 09:43 PM)STyL4 link Wrote: actually we are taught that in John 4 as said, if he takes Bible as an example and calls it a lie then i'll prove him wrong
hum so? no connection to the consitutional movements?
gg
You are saying? Cause you don't make sense...
(05-19-2011, 09:40 PM)Richard link Wrote: Actually, Target has a point there. Everything we take from the Bible or so is pure interpretation, it's the way we read it. It can be seen as both ways. Both how Target says it, and both how Styla says it. You can't really say one of them is wrong.
So how people see it in the middle ages isn't wrong? Cause its free of interpretation?