[Serious Discussion] Religion

[STyL4]

I didn't even read your posts because they're too unattractive and it's the same chitchat over and over anyway. The proof we stated is scientific proof. In other words, it's correct. Whatever anyway, I'm done discussing this with you. You're complaining about your debaters and shit but you're a crap debater yourself. And by the way, you have yet to answer Target.

By the way #2, I did read your post well. I even had to read that junk three times because you can't make a decent reply for shit.

u gave no scientific proofs, what u did was deny something, but obviously i rejected that. flaming again, victory.

"the proof we stated is scientific proof."
Scientific evidence has no universally accepted definition but generally refers to evidence which serves to either support or counter a scientific theory or hypothesis. - so much for that, u didnt even start with a hypothesis LOL.

i give u PREDICTIONS, u wanted PREDICTIONS and here are historical PREDICTIONS that happent.




Im pretty busy now, but i'll reject ur denial Theory 0Target0, to prove us all that God exists and ure wrong yet again. (just give me some time )  yet again obviously.


"And ffs styla put ur quotes in quotecodes, fucking dumb shit
Impossible to take what u write seriously when ppl have to read it 3 times to understand what the fuck your talking about.
You should be banned from this topic if u dont stop with that fuckin shittalk. What grades do u get at school? You seriously have no idea how to build up a paragraph or writing in general. Like, its ok if u dont know how to type, but calling others bad at debating is just extremely fucking stupid if u ask me." - there goes flaming again, victory of the debate. i rejected ur claims 5 times in a row(did u count?), what i gave was clearly explained briefs .or "PREDICTIONS" lmao. now get out of here, what ure stating here is yet again opinion, spamer.


"I watched that video and it's a complete joke when it comes to proving God." - lmao McGlee, the famous Theist debater aproved that video as a solid proof, but he said he's still waiting for more details, now "SMARTASSES" like u and 0Target0 , will reject it? nice though, but u're way too "dumb" to reject it.

"All of the properties we would normally associate with God. Any questions?" lmao. So much for that. " - so much for that what? good old Grim, laughing with no solid proofs, ure one of the best debaters i ever had.