04-10-2011, 12:18 PM
(04-10-2011, 11:24 AM)0Target0 link Wrote: You can't answer this, the so called proof you have is exactly what is described in the above statement. Therefore it is not proof that the bible predicted something, it is written so general that you can give an interpretation the way you want it to be, you call it proof but there is none.
You still did not deliver proof on the higher management claims on Galilei and Keppler, again fantasy explanation?
I am a chemical engineer, scientific proof is what a do for a living.
ORVAL!
ok so plus point for me, I provided proofs for ORCH_OR, what proofs did u provide to discharge it?
"You still did not deliver proof on the higher management claims on Galilei and Keppler, again fantasy explanation?" - its history, its like talking : u dont have any proofs of Newton creating First's Newton's Law, what i said is true as history is true. fine dont belive it, not my problem if u suck at history.
- the rest of them are as miracle as Bible is.
gg! ignore the rest, i know they cant be denied at all.

![[Image: tourney-25.png]](http://i295.photobucket.com/albums/mm153/Mark_Vido/tourney-25.png)