@SAE Grim and 00Target00
you're saying there are conclusions, such as 00target00's fail post, obviously u cant be arsed with other things, because you simple dont know much about Bible obviously and don't know the answer, you two are great debaters!
now let me quote some "CONCLUSIONS" and let me show u HOW "they" "intepretated" the things around them, since you two obviously ignored few FACTs in my previous videos and just concentrated on the ones you MIGHT be able to find the excuse, their "interpretation" and conclusions. FAIR ENOUGH.
THE VOICES OF THE HEAVENS - Amazing! - i guess they could really know what was going on around them, specially about the planets 0Target0! i know u will be SCEPTIC about that TOO, so OK next video:
QUANTUM MECHANICS and THE BIBLE - The Bible was RIGHT before SCIENCE was! - how could they know light was created first? and that nothing could be made without the light? and how could they even know that everything is made of unseen participles? if it was really from "their" perspective and how "they" see it, then how could they even know that? because if u only judge by the look, u wouldnt call it "invisible pieces" so grim and 0target, minus points for you, because those conclusions could not even be made at that time, with THEIR naked eye as u would call it because obviously nothing interpretated that back then.
"for the of the flesh is in the blood..." - that might sound obviousl to u today, but William Harvey , founder of modern physiciology discovered that blood is infact the key factor in maintaining physical life in the 1660, not before at all
"all speaks of the valleys and mountains of the sea" , sea mountains and sea valleys were mentioned before they were discovered by scientists thousand of years after? ehhh conclusion! or maybe a man went for a swim, was under water for 20 mins and found them!
what would u say about DIFFERENT species existing mentioned in the Bible, where they declare reptiles, humans etc. before the evolution and their theories?
actually there are even pieces of evolution theory mentioned
anddddd so onn... trust me, there are MANY more. oh speculations yes! and looking around the nature only. the sky, sea, GALAXY , ... : (
Quantum God Episode Two: Properties of the Universal Orch-OR - combine the ontological argument with parallel universes = sure win, u go Johaan! ORCH-OR does prove God is real. quantum wave-function atta way! dont be posting some dumb shizzle now -.-
now these are the things that cannot be tested urself TwistedDemon, atleast not at that time.
so, TwistedDemon let me just tell u the difference between TESTING ur knowledge by trying it out urself(which can be done) and see what it fits with it or testing the knowledge without having the things to test the hypotesis(unless those man in the time of old Christianity had Rockets, planes, been able to go under the sea for 15 mins, microscope, tools for the medicine etc. ). i would go for number 2. the truth.
you're saying there are conclusions, such as 00target00's fail post, obviously u cant be arsed with other things, because you simple dont know much about Bible obviously and don't know the answer, you two are great debaters!
now let me quote some "CONCLUSIONS" and let me show u HOW "they" "intepretated" the things around them, since you two obviously ignored few FACTs in my previous videos and just concentrated on the ones you MIGHT be able to find the excuse, their "interpretation" and conclusions. FAIR ENOUGH.
THE VOICES OF THE HEAVENS - Amazing! - i guess they could really know what was going on around them, specially about the planets 0Target0! i know u will be SCEPTIC about that TOO, so OK next video:
QUANTUM MECHANICS and THE BIBLE - The Bible was RIGHT before SCIENCE was! - how could they know light was created first? and that nothing could be made without the light? and how could they even know that everything is made of unseen participles? if it was really from "their" perspective and how "they" see it, then how could they even know that? because if u only judge by the look, u wouldnt call it "invisible pieces" so grim and 0target, minus points for you, because those conclusions could not even be made at that time, with THEIR naked eye as u would call it because obviously nothing interpretated that back then.
"for the of the flesh is in the blood..." - that might sound obviousl to u today, but William Harvey , founder of modern physiciology discovered that blood is infact the key factor in maintaining physical life in the 1660, not before at all
"all speaks of the valleys and mountains of the sea" , sea mountains and sea valleys were mentioned before they were discovered by scientists thousand of years after? ehhh conclusion! or maybe a man went for a swim, was under water for 20 mins and found them!
what would u say about DIFFERENT species existing mentioned in the Bible, where they declare reptiles, humans etc. before the evolution and their theories?
actually there are even pieces of evolution theory mentioned anddddd so onn... trust me, there are MANY more. oh speculations yes! and looking around the nature only. the sky, sea, GALAXY , ... : (
Quantum God Episode Two: Properties of the Universal Orch-OR - combine the ontological argument with parallel universes = sure win, u go Johaan! ORCH-OR does prove God is real. quantum wave-function atta way! dont be posting some dumb shizzle now -.-
now these are the things that cannot be tested urself TwistedDemon, atleast not at that time.
so, TwistedDemon let me just tell u the difference between TESTING ur knowledge by trying it out urself(which can be done) and see what it fits with it or testing the knowledge without having the things to test the hypotesis(unless those man in the time of old Christianity had Rockets, planes, been able to go under the sea for 15 mins, microscope, tools for the medicine etc. ). i would go for number 2. the truth.
![[Image: tourney-25.png]](http://i295.photobucket.com/albums/mm153/Mark_Vido/tourney-25.png)