04-05-2011, 05:11 PM
Quote:Universe was at the point, where gravity wasn't strong enough to keep the things in one point."
http://tlc.howstuffworks.com/family/suns...ities5.htm
I don't see how your link denies/proves what I've said. It's just an experiment of gas expansion. How can you even parallel those things? In fact, you don't even need to prove/deny anything. If Universe's gravity would be able to keep the things in one point, we wouldn't be here. There would be no Big Bang.
Quote:"I don't see anything new here. We know that Universe is expanding with an acceleration." read it allOh. Well it is the same as the theory of Big Crunch + the theory of Big Bounce. Nothing new, just theories.
Quote:maybe useless maybe not, but it would be the proof that would make the small chances of happening in Big Bang higher xDIt would prove that other life exists (though it would be stupid to think that it doesn't exist even now). It wouldn't raise the chance of the Big Bang or lower it. Of course, if we could communicate with them, we could ask them about their opinion of the Big Bang.
Quote:they should flood the earth from the sun’s fusion process = doubts about sun's energy source and it just shows how much we REALLY understand universe and it's creation, just a though.I don't really know the intensity of the neutrinos coming to us (if it's one particle time to time, or is it like a shower of neutrinos).
Anyways, if it's one or another, it doesn't have that much of an effect on us, so who cares.
Talking about the Sun as the source of energy, we don't know how to use neutrinos as a power source, but we know how to use photons. The key ingredient of sun batteries is a photon, which knocks an electron from the material.