"Nobody knows where did the Big Bang come from. "
exactly, thank you. that makes the theory even more doubtful.
"Universe isn't in a zone, where the gravity keeps the whole thing from expanding. Hence, it's already proven that Universe is expanding, so that means that at the very moment of the Big Bang Universe was at the point, where gravity wasn't strong enough to keep the things in one point."
An allowance for the expansion of the gaseous component of the Galaxy significantly alters the form of the differential rotation curve derived from observations of the 21-cm hydrogen radio line. A corrected rotation curve is given. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979PAZh....5..124K
"No, the amount of anti-mater isn't equal to the amount of matter. You probably mixed that with the total amount of positively charged particles and negatively charged particles, which, in the sum, make the charge of 0.
And if we can't find something, that doesn't mean that doesn't exist (for example, dark matter, dark energy)."
i said just some versions, mkay? and even those that do not require that are either doubtful.
"I don't see anything new here. We know that Universe is expanding with an acceleration." read it all
"Useless discussion here. We don't know what kind of forms could evolve, smarter or not, what they could have found (maybe they don't even know what is a radio signal). And the distances in the Universe are so damn big, that it would take thousands, millions, billions of years for the signals to reach us from some galaxies."
maybe useless maybe not, but it would be the proof that would make the small chances of happening in Big Bang higher xD
"Well, what about neutrinos? I don't see your question there. Yes, they are small and they are already discovered."
they should flood the earth from the sun’s fusion process = doubts about sun's energy source and it just shows how much we REALLY understand universe and it's creation, just a though.
exactly, thank you. that makes the theory even more doubtful.
"Universe isn't in a zone, where the gravity keeps the whole thing from expanding. Hence, it's already proven that Universe is expanding, so that means that at the very moment of the Big Bang Universe was at the point, where gravity wasn't strong enough to keep the things in one point."
An allowance for the expansion of the gaseous component of the Galaxy significantly alters the form of the differential rotation curve derived from observations of the 21-cm hydrogen radio line. A corrected rotation curve is given. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979PAZh....5..124K
"No, the amount of anti-mater isn't equal to the amount of matter. You probably mixed that with the total amount of positively charged particles and negatively charged particles, which, in the sum, make the charge of 0.
And if we can't find something, that doesn't mean that doesn't exist (for example, dark matter, dark energy)."
i said just some versions, mkay? and even those that do not require that are either doubtful.
"I don't see anything new here. We know that Universe is expanding with an acceleration." read it all
"Useless discussion here. We don't know what kind of forms could evolve, smarter or not, what they could have found (maybe they don't even know what is a radio signal). And the distances in the Universe are so damn big, that it would take thousands, millions, billions of years for the signals to reach us from some galaxies."
maybe useless maybe not, but it would be the proof that would make the small chances of happening in Big Bang higher xD
"Well, what about neutrinos? I don't see your question there. Yes, they are small and they are already discovered."
they should flood the earth from the sun’s fusion process = doubts about sun's energy source and it just shows how much we REALLY understand universe and it's creation, just a though.
![[Image: tourney-25.png]](http://i295.photobucket.com/albums/mm153/Mark_Vido/tourney-25.png)