My friend, this discussion is not about you personally, it is about religion. I strongly believe religion started because they could not explain natural disasters and other phenomena. Religion is the answer to the question of life is something you can not explain. Religion is taking the easy 'medieval' option, it is easy to believe in God. Because of the credibility religion gains if it gives an answer to the people's questions, it is very easy to just believe anything religion says, therefore religion was the most powerfull way to create moral rules for society to live by.
It's hard to not believe in God, it's depressing to know that there is nothing out there and that life can just end in milliseconds, and nothing, nobody will remember this civilisation. Lightness of our existance. Its depressing to know that when you die, nothing remains of you but memories, there is no heaven or hell. Your body is given back to the earth, time continues. What is time? I mean physically, what is time. What makes it so that as you read this one second has passed and it will never return. We all have a deadline, even this earth, hopefully mankind will be smart enough to go to other planets or constellations before this earth ends. I know that thought is mind crushing and a lot of people want to believe that there is life after death.
Before you post more so called 'science' laws, please get them right, because just to inform you, there is more than one law in thermodynamics and all of them are applicable. Consider the maximum entropy-minimal energy postulate, this is an optimum and thus can create organisation. It is easy to take one parameter and say HAH! see this law is not correct.
I believe that all of us do not have enough education to properly discuss thermodynamics, for me this is by far, and for alot of people, the hardest and most abstract course I have had in my life (this includes professors and doctors thank you). I wish I could quote my mathematics professors about thermodynamics and physicochemistry.
Science has been constantly crushing the world image of religious people, sorry for that, but I like the real truth.
I feel that i don't need to read books about religion, since for me religion is obsolete and the people who write books about religion are most probably biased.
Disagreement about religious views is what most wars have been fought about during the ages. I strongly believe that there is no end to this discussion on this forum and it will only end in a fight again.
I think it is useless to argue with people who have arguments that cannot be proven, because it leaves the option open to say anything you want.
For me it's just fine what people believe in, just think to how you contribute to the world by believing.
I personally think religious people don't contribute at all, at least not on a long term.
Also Styl4, please don't get personal in argumentation, I just would like a rational discussion. Only people who are losing in debates get personal. Saying to people that they dont know much about religion is a pretty personal argument, what you are trying to say is, look you are not qualified to talk about this.
It's hard to not believe in God, it's depressing to know that there is nothing out there and that life can just end in milliseconds, and nothing, nobody will remember this civilisation. Lightness of our existance. Its depressing to know that when you die, nothing remains of you but memories, there is no heaven or hell. Your body is given back to the earth, time continues. What is time? I mean physically, what is time. What makes it so that as you read this one second has passed and it will never return. We all have a deadline, even this earth, hopefully mankind will be smart enough to go to other planets or constellations before this earth ends. I know that thought is mind crushing and a lot of people want to believe that there is life after death.
Before you post more so called 'science' laws, please get them right, because just to inform you, there is more than one law in thermodynamics and all of them are applicable. Consider the maximum entropy-minimal energy postulate, this is an optimum and thus can create organisation. It is easy to take one parameter and say HAH! see this law is not correct.
I believe that all of us do not have enough education to properly discuss thermodynamics, for me this is by far, and for alot of people, the hardest and most abstract course I have had in my life (this includes professors and doctors thank you). I wish I could quote my mathematics professors about thermodynamics and physicochemistry.
Science has been constantly crushing the world image of religious people, sorry for that, but I like the real truth.
I feel that i don't need to read books about religion, since for me religion is obsolete and the people who write books about religion are most probably biased.
Disagreement about religious views is what most wars have been fought about during the ages. I strongly believe that there is no end to this discussion on this forum and it will only end in a fight again.
I think it is useless to argue with people who have arguments that cannot be proven, because it leaves the option open to say anything you want.
For me it's just fine what people believe in, just think to how you contribute to the world by believing.
I personally think religious people don't contribute at all, at least not on a long term.
Also Styl4, please don't get personal in argumentation, I just would like a rational discussion. Only people who are losing in debates get personal. Saying to people that they dont know much about religion is a pretty personal argument, what you are trying to say is, look you are not qualified to talk about this.