Football Topic

[Munch]

imo i dont think losing 3-0 makes you a better team, if arsenal was good enough like your saying, it would of been 0-0 or 1-0 for arsenal.

The score only means Chelsea were the better side infront of goal and took their chances (and for the second goal, the Arsenal guy). They did play the better side. Arsenal had like 68% - 74% of the ball all the way through, but with that small percentage Chelsea had the ball they made good use of it, which is how Liverpool failed to win so much this season (same reason why we drew so much last season too).

Liverpool won 2-0 at the weekend the game before the London Derby and I can tell you Everton were the better team, but Liverpool had the luck infront of goal (they were pretty much luck. If Yobo weren't in the way Mascherano wouldn't of got that first goal and perhaps the second goal was a bit of skill but it was also due to the defender's inability to read our players properly when it was important). Everton had the bad luck of getting two goals disallowed due to offside (the first goal was nice too) and the guy who caused the first offside goal was only slightly offside, the other two were miles off.

Just goes to show that the end result only shows the winner, not the better team.

When United drew 3-3 against Moscow I was just watching the results on Sky Sports News and saw Moscow kicking United's arse 3-1, I didn't watch to see if Moscow prior to the last two goals really were kicking Man U's arse or were they just really lucky, all I saw was Man U down 3-1 (and happy too). And then seeing them get them two quick late goals would of also made the average viewer think (a young)King Kenny came on or something, we never knew if Man U were really lucky and got two easy late goals or if they were really good.