Hello There, Guest! Login or Register


Battlefield 3
#11
(01-15-2011, 09:07 AM)Flyby link Wrote:They said for those that preordered Medal of Honor would get access to the beta 12 months after the release of Medal of Honor. As
yea i got medal of honor tier 1 edition
Reply
#12
1942 > all battlefields
Reply
#13
(01-15-2011, 05:15 PM)Thug link Wrote:1942 > all battlefields
+1, 1942 is awesome
Reply
#14
2142>1942>BF2  >:)
Reply
#15
(01-19-2011, 04:18 AM)Vinnie link Wrote:2142>1942>BF2  >:)

You liked 2142? What about it did you like?
Reply
#16
I liked the engineering turrets thingies :P That was always fun
The game got boring fast though
Reply
#17
Quote:Grim link=topic=27616.msg369887#msg369887 date=1295426390]
I liked the engineering turrets thingies :P That was always fun
The game got boring fast though

They were nice, so were the deployable shields. Why did you rank it higher than 1942 and BF2?
Reply
#18
Guess Vinnie should answer that ; )
But for me it would go something like this: BC2 > BF2 > 2142
Those are the only BF games I got any good experience on.
Reply
#19
Quote:Grim link=topic=27616.msg369963#msg369963 date=1295476612]
Guess Vinnie should answer that ; )

opps, lol...didnt notice it was someone different :P


BFBC2 definitely did have great things that it added to the battlefield franchise like a well done unlock system and a very realistic bullet path with the sniper.
Reply
#20
(01-20-2011, 03:46 AM)cloakster link Wrote:opps, lol...didnt notice it was someone different :P


BFBC2 definitely did have great things that it added to the battlefield franchise like a well done unlock system and a very realistic bullet path with the sniper.

I think the sense of atmosphere created in BFBC2 is unmatched in any other multiplayer game of its type with sound, visuals and worlds reaction to the player (destruction) working so well with one another. It won't obviously hold a candle to previous games in regards to content (maps, size, player count and etc.,) but I thought it was a great game to play.
Reply