(09-13-2008, 11:58 PM)tomozj link Wrote: Administrators who wouldn't treat all gangs equally would have to face Dennis - I hope that your image of 'unfair admins' using this feature is clouding your opinion.
It is more than an image, it is a reality. It has been occuring for months, so obviously the administrators will have to "face" somebody else.
(09-14-2008, 02:51 AM)HaZe link Wrote: tomozj isn't against gangs... he has quite a gang past you know. B&A and i believe CT before that.Some people quit gangs and become crew, and all of a sudden think they're so much better than gangmembers, for whatever reason.
Just, some people.
(09-14-2008, 01:55 AM)tomozj link Wrote: On what do you base that? I'm simply wanting to clamp down on flaming.. and gangs are the #1 culprits of flaming.And crewmembers are the #1 culprits of admin abuse

It seems that if admins see people flame "flamers," or people who flame back, they don't mute them.
But once it happens to a random or a "non-flamer," they're suddenly muted.
Admins would have to mute all gangs equally, and mute based on the SAME set of words/severity of flame... I really don't see it happening.
And yes, you are punishing everyone in the gang, not just the one person.
![[Image: 2ccl6vs.jpg]](http://i48.tinypic.com/2ccl6vs.jpg)