09-12-2008, 03:40 PM
(09-12-2008, 02:22 AM)Fry link Wrote: Well, when I mentioned "griefing" , I was referring to gang members possibly abusing it to punish their friends.
I think it's possible that instead of gang members helping shape eachother up, they'll just get mad at each other when one screws up. You claim they have a "bulldog mentality", and I think that would make them more likely to play the blame game or spark conflicts when one gets them all in trouble.
Who cares if they blame each other and conflict with each other? They won't be doing that ingame.
(09-12-2008, 02:22 AM)Fry link Wrote: Another flaw with kicking everyone in the same gang automatically is kick reasons for anything other than bad behavior. If someone's idling, bugged, or whatever non-behavioral reason you can think of, the other gang members shouldn't be punished at all.
That would be sorted of course - we're only talking for legitimate kicks for breaking the rules.
(09-12-2008, 02:22 AM)Fry link Wrote: There is more potential for abuse than simply friendly teasing - a possibility for trolling. Say you want to raise hell, you ask for a gang to invite you, and as soon as they do, you do something to get all of them in trouble.
That's the gang's fault for inviting random players.. leaders would be responsible for who they decide to team up with!