Post your computr spec here!

[Maka]

OS: WinXP Professional 5.1 SP2 (Build #2600) (Dell)
CPU: Intel Pentium D , 2.99 GHz, 0KB
Video: NVIDIA GeForce 7300 LE (1024x768x32bpp 60Hz)
Sound: SB X-Fi Audio [CCE0]
HD: Free: 253.45 GB/298.00 GB
Connection: Intel® PRO/1000 PL Network Connection - Pakketplanner-minipoort @ 100.0 Mbps (Rec: 199.21MB Sent: 14.16MB)

>.>

[Peter]

Dacads link=topic=4654.msg135643#msg135643 date=1218376737]
DELL WINDOWS XP INTEL PENTIUM 4.

1TB HARD DRIVE.

3GBRAM

22" TFT MONITOR

QUAD CORE PROCESSOR 3.0GHZ(2 CPUS)

beat that fools

There are no Pentium 4 Quad Core processors. Especially none running at 3 Ghz.

[[UvH]Hitman]

Yes. A Pentium 4 Quad CPU with 2 CPUS? LOL.

There is just one serie with dual Pentium4- GPUs, the  Pentium D. Which has nothing to do with the Core2 Technology, the Pentium D is based on the Netburst technology, which sucks. Your Processor sucks. I bet your RAM sucks, because it does not run in dualchannel (it runs in dualchannel if you have 2x 1024 and 2x 512MB ). Your CPU sucks again, it was not made for gaming. :-)


BTW, the  Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 is now on the same price level as the Q9450 in germany, ~245€

[mjaa]

Lets do a test


Edit: find a easyer test.

this will rate your computer and give u are score:

http://service.futuremark.com/virtualmark/start.action



My score:

11600

http://service.futuremark.com/home.actio...ultType=22

[[UvH]Hitman]

Futuremark sucks.

3Dmark sucks. Vantage sucks. Virtualmark sucks too.
The points you get dont count, the power in games does.

If i have a Quadcore  4x 3GHz  i have in the Vantage test (or any other)  about 3000-5000 points more, but ingame i have the same FPS like a dualcore with 2x 3GHz, because  only 2-3 games support Quads.

Tests are nonsense

[Zezima]

where i finde my comp specs ? lol

[mjaa]

Hitman link=topic=4654.msg137427#msg137427 date=1219046711]
Futuremark sucks.

3Dmark sucks. Vantage sucks. Virtualmark sucks too.
The points you get dont count, the power in games does.

If i have a Quadcore  4x 3GHz  i have in the Vantage test (or any other)  about 3000-5000 points more, but ingame i have the same FPS like a dualcore with 2x 3GHz, because  only 2-3 games support Quads.

Tests are nonsense

Too bad sa-mp doesn't include a benchmark test

It's not the our diffrent graphic cards we compare here, its our computers.
And like you said, futuremark gives you more points for a quad for example. Because its better

[[UvH]Hitman]

It is not better. Its more expensive

I bet  99.9% of all gamers wouldnt feel the difference between a  Q9650 (4x 3GHz) and a E8400 (2x 3GHz), because no games has a big profit of quads. And maybe 5 have ANY profit of quads, mostly 1-5%.

Quads for gamers are nonsense, because so less games support it. But its usual for graphics design, video encoding, photo-editing and stuff.
Its made for this kind of applications, not for games

[mjaa]

Hitman link=topic=4654.msg137526#msg137526 date=1219073931]
It is not better. Its more expensive

I bet  99.9% of all gamers wouldnt feel the difference between a  Q9650 (4x 3GHz) and a E8400 (2x 3GHz), because no games has a big profit of quads. And maybe 5 have ANY profit of quads, mostly 1-5%.

Quads for gamers are nonsense, because so less games support it. But its usual for graphics design, video encoding, photo-editing and stuff.
Its made for this kind of applications, not for games

The quad has more cashe and windows can still use the 2 other cores to other stuff like antivirus etc  when you are gaming so you got 2 free cores to game with.

So i think more then 0.1 would feel diffrent


And like i said, futumark gives point of what computer you got.. not the best game fps.  And its our computers we compare here

[ayam]

Your computer's fasteness also depends on the hardwares you are using, take that into account. I can get like 80+ FPS in COD4 and C&C3.