Glad to hear that ELABD, it brings me much hope
If I may just chime in with a couple of thoughts...
I just wish people would treat religion with the same skepticism as you say you treat science in your above post. I understand what you're saying regarding the 'I need to study to understand that this isn't bullshit-' many people are in the same boat. There's this odd juxtaposition between trusting/(having faith) in scientists and not believing anything based on the person's position, or, argument on authority. The major differences between this and religion, as I see it, are as follows:
1. All science is completely open to scrutiny. There is nothing sacred about any part of scientific knowledge- anyone is open to argue against anything brought up by science. Of course, if you have a 14 year old's level of understanding and you're arguing a case against evolution with countless thousands of professors, PhDs and Masters of science, you're going to be ridiculed (at least in any country where science and education are taken seriously).
2. The fruits of science can be observed, if you are reading this, in your immediate vicinity. Our notions on religion were stronger 300 years ago than they are now, but you didn't have computers, the internet- not cars and not even light bulbs. Our scientific knowledge, on the other hand, has grown at an exponential rate over the last couple of hundred years, and so we can do all of these amazing things. I see no reason scientists as a collective would selectively bullshit about one or two things.
3. Science presents its evidence to the public. Most bits of scientific knowledge are available to anyone with access to a library or the internet, so there is no hiding.
There are also areas like string theory which divide a number of top scientists. Anything truly on the forefront of science will do that, at any given time. Something like evolution is an old theory- there are still many biological questions still unanswered, but the fact is that it's incredibly well understood, accepted by everybody in the field of science that's worth their salt, and not even mentioned in argument in typical scientific discourse. It can also be observed in species today! [
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_wall_lizard]
As such, there are a number of scientific ideas where, although one such as myself wouldn't understand the evidence (ie, quantum theory), I can directly see the fruits of that research, and we'll all see it soon enough in quantum computers. And, if ever I feel disenchanted or distrusting of the scientists studying quantum mechanics, I know that I can open up a book on QM and start reading. If I were to decidedly remain ignorant and argue against it, I'd be giving up my dignity and looking as big of an idiot as the anti-evolution camp.