Response to the poll on C-Bug + 2 Shot

[HaZe]

Rules of this thread:
1. don't disrespect a person's opinion
2. state simply which one you voted for
3 (optional). state why you voted for it
4. no debates

I voted for C-bug only, since I find it to be a reasonable trick to have. 2 shot is just mindless and nonstop sawnoff shots, and totally takes out the four shot backround that LVP is well known for.

[Maka]

I voted for C-bug only, since I find it to be a reasonable trick to have. 2 shot is just mindless and nonstop sawnoff shots, and totally takes out the four shot backround that LVP is well known for.

[Jay]

I voted for none at all

[Munch]

Rules of this thread:
1. don't disrespect a person's opinion
2. state simply which one you voted for
3 (optional). state why you voted for it
4. no debates

I voted for C-bug only, since I find it to be a reasonable trick to have. 2 shot is just mindless and nonstop sawnoff shots, and totally takes out the four shot backround that LVP is well known for.

I agree. It'll just make C-Bug be like as if you weren't using C-bug at all. It'll over power deagles by far, especially if fighting someone who's got at 2-shot.

[Peru]

I will admit that I have used 2-Shot before...but not C-Bug.

I'm fine with 2-Shot, so I chose 2-shot.

[Maddolis]

I voted c-bug but not 2shot.
My main argument for allowing c-bug was to increase the LVP fighter's arsenal, and 2shot would do the complete opposite of that.

[TEF]

[quote author=HaZe link=topic=14540.msg155253#msg155253 date=1226957775]
I voted for C-bug only, since I find it to be a reasonable trick to have. 2 shot is just mindless and nonstop sawnoff shots, and totally takes out the four shot backround that LVP is well known for.

[/quote]

[n00ne]

I voted just for c-bug

[[BH]Hitman]

I voted for none at all

[Darkfire]

I voted for C-bug only, since I find it to be a reasonable trick to have. 2 shot is just mindless and nonstop sawnoff shots, and totally takes out the four shot backround that LVP is well known for.