Science vs Mythology

[Jerome]

I believe the fundamental idea here is that in order to bring a concept to a group of people, you must convince them somehow. In our society convincing people requires reasonable proof with existential import; proof based on observation of the world. This is called evidence. All of the scientific theories have evidence to support them. But the idea of a theory, as Calimero mentioned, is a model that best fits gathered evidence, or behaviors. "Bests fits" means that it is not 100% correct, and thus is wrong.

So, tell me: How can we have all of this evidence for scientific theories and have them still be wrong, yet people come about with no evidence for mythology and claim it's truth?

So what you're saying is -

Science is always right, whereas, Myths are never ever going to be right.

Not once have I said that Science can be denied. Science is fact, something proven. But how fucking hard can it be, to believe in something that you cannot see .. or have no evidence of it being "real" .. how hard can it be, to take a deeper look and not just look at the surface of things, take things for what they are and just move on, but delve deeper and use some fucking imagination or something. Christ, if everybody looked at the world half of you do it'd be one hell of a boring place, for me anyways.

The link Carcass posted has little to no credibility.

Ofc it doesn't ... just dismiss it. Forget it.