Science vs Mythology

[Jerome]

Jerome, your argument saying "you cant prove it didnt live" is complete bullshit. We can also say "you cant prove that your dragon existed - so it didnt exist."

Get good arguments, and you'll see that you'll get a good discussion.


PS: To your § about Santa Clause... well he indeed existed, but the Santa Clause we know today (the big man with the red coat, white beard, sack with presents etc) was actually invented as a big big BIG tv advertisement by Coca Cola.

k HaZe.

Dragons never existed

And if you are interested, maybe you'd like to take some time and read this page.

Then tell me, can your Science prove that the Pteranadon did not evolve into a Dragon like creature, or maybe you can use Science to prove that these "Myths" of knights killing these kind of creatures (which are, like I said in-game,evidently Dinosaurs) are not true.


And alas, whilst on the subject, you stated "why cant there be flying reindeers" well, in answer to your question - There cannot be flying reindeers .. not all myths will have evolved from true stories, or did indeed evolve from true happenings, but obviously exaggerated over time, for example ... ever played Chinese whispers?

So anyways, the point I'm making here is that Science cannot prove Myths wrong, just because of the fact that they have no evidence to support it's actuality. And that works both ways, likewise I cannot prove to you anything without evidence of Dragon existence, except I have proved to you that there is real dragons today, alive, and I have given you an explanation as to what I was trying to explain in-game - Dragons could've been Dinosaurs.

And speaking of Myths being exaggerated, Santa Clause was real too.

Not that I believe in the Myth itself, but it's origins I do believe of, see here

So anyways, just felt like I needed to say a few things and clear up any misunderstanding.

k.