should nuclear power be used or not

[LIke]

well nuclear power solves the oil burning problem bla bla bla, but we can see the example of an accident on chernobyl and it will stay radioactive for 25years arpox.

Radioactive waste is a waste product containing radioactive material. It is usually the product of a nuclear process such as nuclear fission, though industries not directly connected to the nuclear power industry may also produce radioactive waste.

isnt fission what they do to produce nuclear power? and where do they put that nuclear waste?

[durrrrr]

well nuclear power solves the oil burning problem bla bla bla, but we can see the example of an accident on chernobyl and it will stay radioactive for 25years arpox.

In April (I guess) 25 years will have passed after the explosion. And I don't know if it really counts here too, but uranium loses it's radioactivity by 50% after more than 4 billion years.

isnt fission what they do to produce nuclear power? and where do they put that nuclear waste?

Fission is when atoms split, fusion is when atoms combine. And I think they put nuclear waste deep in the ground.

[Turkey]

Human kind is not able to live without nuclear power. Nuclear plants are becomming way more sofisticated and keep improving. Cherynobel is an example which nothing could compare with.

The human race as we know it has been here for 200.000 years. Oh yes, we are.

[Daniel]

trolololololol

[Maddolis]

My theory is the earthquake was the same natural disaster that's been occuring regularly in the earth over the last 4.6 billion fucking years.

[Maka]

My theory is the earthquake was the same natural disaster that's been occuring regularly in the earth over the last 4.6 billion fucking years.

Someone with sense, teehee.

[Daniel]

Watch and learn.

Jeremy Rifkin on global issues and the future of our planet

Sorry for the dutch subs couldn't find another version

[Weezy]

Green Design?

[KingJd]

doesn't matter , this world is fucked

[Nater]

doesn't matter , this world is fucked

+1