Posts: 4,761
Threads: 140
Joined: Jul 2008
Well more gangbases would spread the gangs all over the map..
just do it like i mentioned in a post above, lets have only ONE gangbase, but this gangbase should give way more to the gang that owns it than it does now, so that its worth buying and fighting for
|
Posts: 1,203
Threads: 35
Joined: Nov 2008
(05-22-2009, 10:29 AM)Hitman link Wrote: Well more gangbases would spread the gangs all over the map..
just do it like i mentioned in a post above, lets have only ONE gangbase, but this gangbase should give way more to the gang that owns it than it does now, so that its worth buying and fighting for
1 gang base will be borin after some weeks nyways.
I think, placin 2 or 3 gang base will not hurt any one as far as WARS take places at GBs only !
|
Posts: 492
Threads: 29
Joined: Nov 2007
Gang bases would be much easier and faster to implement than gang territories.
Quote:just do it like i mentioned in a post above, lets have only ONE gangbase, but this gangbase should give way more to the gang that owns it than it does now, so that its worth buying and fighting for
+1
|
Posts: 15,154
Threads: 447
Joined: Jan 2007
(05-22-2009, 10:38 AM)bAd CaT link Wrote: 1 gang base will be borin after some weeks nyways.
I think, placin 2 or 3 gang base will not hurt any one as far as WARS take places at GBs only !
How would it be boring? It's been like that before you even heard of SA-MP and it is still used. Way less than it was before, true, but there's this topic for that, ideas to spice it up.
As Hitman said, it'd spread gangs more, having even less fights than there are right now.
|
Posts: 2,526
Threads: 75
Joined: Nov 2008
i agree with Hitman, get the current GB better, more HP, more cash etc.
That'd make more gangs to gather up there, and fight for it.
|
Posts: 1,203
Threads: 35
Joined: Nov 2008
05-23-2009, 09:08 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-23-2009, 09:25 AM by bAd CaT)
(05-22-2009, 02:09 PM)Richard link Wrote: As Hitman said, it'd spread gangs more, having even less fights than there are right now.
yeah , bt after some times it will be borin, as most of players still borin by fightin at GB or ship or near FC ONLY  . Adding more stuffs in GB effects only for few months i think.
it wil be more fun if there is 2 or 3 HQs !!! So each gang could have their own HQ then they can conquer other's HQ , jus think abt it !!
|
Posts: 15,154
Threads: 447
Joined: Jan 2007
You think about it some more. If one GB would get boring, how would 3 places, far from each other probably, be better? You'd have to go from LV to LS for example, by the time you get there, your other base is taken. You take the LS base, and either go back to LV or go for the SF one. See above for what happens.
|
Posts: 3,414
Threads: 145
Joined: Jan 2008
(05-23-2009, 11:06 AM)Richard link Wrote: You think about it some more. If one GB would get boring, how would 3 places, far from each other probably, be better? You'd have to go from LV to LS for example, by the time you get there, your other base is taken. You take the LS base, and either go back to LV or go for the SF one. See above for what happens.  Yeah, true.
I think the minigame should be like;
Team B: Starts at GANG BASE.
Team C: Starts at the burger shop.
Now what my point is, that team b is gonna defend gang base.
While team C, are gonna attack gang base. And they also got some cars outside the burger shop to get faster to the gang base.
What you think?
|
Posts: 15,154
Threads: 447
Joined: Jan 2007
It's not really meant as minigame..
|
Posts: 1,203
Threads: 35
Joined: Nov 2008
05-23-2009, 11:55 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-25-2009, 06:19 AM by bAd CaT)
Why always comparing to other servers ? Just look at poll !! most of 'em like more than 1 GB..  , if this is implement then y !!
|
|