+- Las Venturas Playground (https://forum.sa-mp.nl)
+-- Forum: Miscellaneous (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: Player Introductions (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-15.html)
+--- Thread: [Introduction] [SWK]Shark (/thread-14763.html)
Re: [Introduction] [SWK]Shark - HoogerBooger - 01-29-2009
(01-29-2009, 02:53 PM)Maddolis link Wrote: Honestly LVP started the whole "we're better than LWs" thing
That's because we are <insert sarcastic smiley which actually isn't sarcastic>.
Re: [Introduction] [SWK]Shark - LilJoN - 01-29-2009
Quote:Shark link=topic=15692.msg164709#msg164709 date=1230496719]lol dude they range banned me in-game and on forums cuz i said new eVo fails(leaded by ltg_benny and schmizla aka rizla) and the other 1 leaded by rezeflection aka rezerection was way better
No surprise man, I got banned from their channel for saying that one of their head admins used 2shot.
Oh and about the sea FUCKING RAMP BUG!
Re: [Introduction] [SWK]Shark - TEF - 01-30-2009
(01-29-2009, 02:53 PM)Maddolis link Wrote: Honestly LVP started the whole "we're better than LWs" thing, and while it may be true in terms of fighting skill, LVP have shovelled LWs more crap than LWs have on LVP.I was commenting on all the other insults that were going on, both from [V3loc1Ty] and the LVP regulars. Let's not assume anything here, Maddolis.
Although I don't like Velocity his "lvp regular prevention script" post was really, really soft compared to a lot of the stuff that has been said, and I wouldn't class it as being "utterly disrespectful" at all.
Re: [Introduction] [SWK]Shark - Maddolis - 01-30-2009
I'm not assuming LVP have given more shit to LW'ers, I'm saying it.
Not that they're saints either- while I will stay that a good number of LVP bans are really quite pathetic, they're incomparable to some LWs bans.
Re: [Introduction] [SWK]Shark - TEF - 01-30-2009
(01-30-2009, 04:56 AM)Maddolis link Wrote: I'm not assuming LVP have given more shit to LW'ers, I'm saying it.No, I meant that you were sort of assuming I was only talking about [V3loc1Ty] when I was actually talking about everyone... Seems we've misunderstood one another yet again.
Re: [Introduction] [SWK]Shark - Darius - 02-05-2009
(01-30-2009, 04:56 AM)Maddolis link Wrote: I'm not assuming LVP have given more shit to LW'ers, I'm saying it.Who cares if were worse for flaming them? At least when we flame them we use a little bit of originality and intelligence. They just use 'I FACKED UR MOM DIKHED!!!!'
Not that they're saints either- while I will stay that a good number of LVP bans are really quite pathetic, they're incomparable to some LWs bans.
Re: [Introduction] [SWK]Shark - Maddolis - 02-06-2009
(02-05-2009, 08:46 PM)Darius link Wrote: At least when we flame them we use a little bit of originality and intelligence.
Not from what I've seen.
Re: [Introduction] [SWK]Shark - HoogerBooger - 02-06-2009
"Flaming with style" by HoogerBooger - prices start from 5 million ingame money.
Re: [Introduction] [SWK]Shark - Hitman - 02-06-2009
So, Hooger, does that mean i can pay you some cash, and you will hit this person up on LVP and flame it to death?
Re: [Introduction] [SWK]Shark - Strika - 02-17-2009
[NWA]Shark? dat the one? Ye think so, sup man good times in LW's
