01-08-2009, 07:18 PM
I agree that this step is a little extreme to combat piracy, and when I first read an online article on this I didn't think it was as serious as is made out in this topic, and it isn't. I doubt they would even bother hacking into a computer just to catch another filesharer, but instead they would use it to check on terror suspects and larger scale criminals. This is also backed up by:
It would be extremely costly and time consuming to hack into millions of computers just to track those who download a few MP3s.
(01-07-2009, 09:45 PM)EvilGate link Wrote: A remote search can be granted if a senior officer says he "believes" that it is "proportionate" and necessary to prevent or detect serious crime — defined as any offence attracting a jail sentence of more than three years.
It would be extremely costly and time consuming to hack into millions of computers just to track those who download a few MP3s.
![[Image: 2i8kark.png]](http://i57.tinypic.com/2i8kark.png)

![[Image: vintage_arma_ii_dayz_signature_by_mindwav3-d5lwc0s.png]](http://fc09.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2012/327/7/5/vintage_arma_ii_dayz_signature_by_mindwav3-d5lwc0s.png)
![[Image: sig542.jpg]](http://www.ra3boards.com/sig_gen/sig542.jpg)