Hello There, Guest! Login or Register


Can you calculate this?! (Well, JERICO CAN!)
#31
It was correct, you only misunderstood my personal definition of it. If I posted that in roman numbers, would you have called that wrong? YOU got it wrong instead. (future lawyer here, you can't win _O-)
Reply
#32
(10-23-2010, 06:31 PM)Gaahl link Wrote: It was correct, you only misunderstood my personal definition of it. If I posted that in roman numbers, would you have called that wrong? YOU got it wrong instead. (future lawyer here, you can't win _O-)

"I won my first case..    on the internet."
Reply
#33
(10-23-2010, 06:31 PM)Gaahl link Wrote: It was correct, you only misunderstood my personal definition of it. If I posted that in roman numbers, would you have called that wrong? YOU got it wrong instead. (future lawyer here, you can't win _O-)

YES it would be the wrong answer in roman numbers! O-)
Reply
#34
(10-23-2010, 06:32 PM)Rien link Wrote: "I won my first case..    on the internet."

That would simply be epic. Because... the Internet is POWAHHHH.
Reply
#35
(10-23-2010, 06:31 PM)Gaahl link Wrote: It was correct, you only misunderstood my personal definition of it. If I posted that in roman numbers, would you have called that wrong? YOU got it wrong instead. (future lawyer here, you can't win _O-)


You can only get it correct if you post it in whatever stupid way he wants it. Like a comma after every 3 digits is wrong as it means a decimal to him.
Reply
#36
Why am I even on that list?
Reply
#37
(10-23-2010, 07:01 PM)Rien link Wrote: Why am I even on that list?

Because you're Rien, duh!
Reply
#38
yeah it's basicly the same as <3^2 x 201 + 30021 -9232^4 = 2 x 1337 = 2674

O+
Reply
#39
(10-23-2010, 07:13 PM)jerico link Wrote: yeah it's basicly the same as <3^2 x 201 + 30021 -9232^4 = 2 x 1337 = 2674

O+

What the fuck does that mean

Math genius!
Reply
#40
(10-23-2010, 07:56 PM)iou link Wrote: What the fuck does that mean

Math genius!

Hell Yeah! And that even means. that <3 =  O+ = 6011648,2698686780083130219515352

O-)
Reply