![]() |
|
[Serious Discussion] Religion - Printable Version +- Las Venturas Playground (https://forum.sa-mp.nl) +-- Forum: Miscellaneous (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: General Talk (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-24.html) +--- Thread: [Serious Discussion] Religion (/thread-26936.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
|
Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - Maddolis - 02-14-2013 (02-13-2013, 05:59 PM)evskiboy link Wrote: I don't believe in any religion, i'm not an atheist either, i just find the stories of religion so unbelievable and unrealistic, hearing stuff about angels telling prophets and people rising from the dead. I just cannot believe that, i think there being an easter bunny or santa being just as plausible. Well then you are 100% atheist... The issue is that the term 'atheist' has such a social stigma attached to it that so many people won't label themselves. If you are religious, you can be labelled as 'theist.' If you believe that a supernatural supreme being created the Universe, but does not intervene with human life (ie, believe in Evolution, perhaps too the Big Bang, but believe a deity created the Big Bang), then you can be labelled as 'deist.' If you do not believe that there is any supernatural supreme being or deity, then you are an atheist. ...if you are open to the idea of there being a god or gods that created the Universe, yet do not believe in it until there is evidence, you are still an atheist. It's just that a lot of people prefer the weasel-word 'agnostic,' either because they do not wish to attract the many, often negative implications that the term 'atheist' carries, or they simply misunderstand the term. Also, you shouldn't feel sorry for voicing such an inoffensive, humble and completely justified opinion as the one you just did. Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - evskiboy - 02-14-2013 Aha ok, well i don't like being called an atheist, as i am not part or any group or religion, i am not a sheep or a follower I have my own mind and make my own judgement based on my own opinions. Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - Maka - 02-14-2013 Oh man I happily label myself as an atheist. Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - DeLiC - 02-14-2013 (02-14-2013, 12:18 PM)evskiboy link Wrote: Aha ok, well i don't like being called an atheist, as i am not part or any group or religion, i am not a sheep or a followerin religion you're considerd a follower of the devil then same as me
Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - Maddolis - 02-15-2013 (02-14-2013, 12:25 PM)Maka link Wrote: Oh man I happily label myself as an atheist. Oh yes, likewise. Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - [NB]Zaibatsu - 03-13-2013 so.............. can god create a burrito that hot even he is unable to eat it? Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - Nater - 03-14-2013 Quote:Zaibatsu link=topic=28190.msg438197#msg438197 date=1363189549] Roflmao ZaibZ
Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - Darius - 03-15-2013 (02-15-2013, 04:27 AM)Maddolis link Wrote: Oh yes, likewise.If you describe yourself as "Atheist," some people will say, "Don't you mean 'Agnostic'?" I have to reply that I really do mean Atheist. I really do not believe that there is a god — in fact I am convinced that there is not a god (a subtle difference). I see not a shred of evidence to suggest that there is one. It's easier to say that I am a radical Atheist, just to signal that I really mean it, have thought about it a great deal, and that it's an opinion I hold seriously. It's funny how many people are genuinely surprised to hear a view expressed so strongly. In England we seem to have drifted from vague, wishy-washy Anglicanism to vague, wishy-washy Agnosticism — both of which I think betoken a desire not to have to think about things too much. People will then often say, "But surely it's better to remain an Agnostic just in case?" This, to me, suggests such a level of silliness and muddle that I usually edge out of the conversation rather than get sucked into it. (If it turns out that I've been wrong all along, and there is in fact a god, and if it further turned out that this kind of legalistic, cross-your-fingers-behind-your-back, Clintonian hair-splitting impressed him, then I would choose not to worship him anyway.) - Douglas Adams (RIP )
Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - Maddolis - 03-16-2013 ^Precisely. Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - Munch - 03-26-2013 A 15 year old girl is sentenced to 100 lashes in the Maldives after she admitted to having pre-marital sex. This was while she was talking about her step-father raping her and murdering her baby (that the step-father put inside her). http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/sentenced-to-100-lashes-in-the-maldives-15yearold-girl-raped-by-stepfather-who-then-murdered-baby-8513293.html I see stories like this and I continue to wonder why religion is given special treatment when it comes to rules. Like on this site you're meant to be respectful to religions. Why? What makes them worthy of such respect? Why is it okay for someone to mock me for supporting Liverpool FC (football), or mock Liverpool FC in general, but it's not okay to mock someone for being Muslim or Christian (or their religion)? Both are made up organisations that we choose to follow, though usually influenced by parents. What makes religion and religious people more special than sports and sport fans? I've never understood that. |