![]() |
|
Street's Diciples [D] - Printable Version +- Las Venturas Playground (https://forum.sa-mp.nl) +-- Forum: Main Talk (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: Gangs (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-22.html) +--- Thread: Street's Diciples [D] (/thread-7672.html) |
Re: Street's Diciples [D] - theInfamous - 04-12-2008 My homie Ismael :7 Re: Street's Diciples [D] - mjaa - 04-12-2008 i don't wanna be allied with CT.. But i don't care if scoop reev inf and more from D is joining CT. That's there's choice. but seems like the whole [D] is allied with CT now? Re: Street's Diciples [D] - Fredling - 04-12-2008 (04-12-2008, 08:39 PM)mjaa link Wrote: i don't wanna be allied with CT.. But i don't care if scoop reev inf and more from D is joining CT. That's there's choice.Obviously... That means we need to do alot of homework, learning CT's memberlist Re: Street's Diciples [D] - HaZe - 04-12-2008 alliances are so lame. this is what kills the gang action at LVP.. everyone teaming up. everyone needs to hold their own ground for a great LVP gang experience. srsly dont even bother with alliances.. they bring conflict and boredom. you're in a gang for a reason, to watch each other and work together. You're not supposed to have a tea party with every f***ing gang in LVP. just my 2 cents Re: Street's Diciples [D] - Fredling - 04-12-2008 (04-12-2008, 09:34 PM)HaZe link Wrote: alliances are so lame. this is what kills the gang action at LVP.. everyone teaming up. everyone needs to hold their own ground for a great LVP gang experience. srsly dont even bother with alliances.. they bring conflict and boredom. you're in a gang for a reason, to watch each other and work together. You're not supposed to have a tea party with every f***ing gang in LVP. just my 2 centsCannot agree more Re: Street's Diciples [D] - Chris5170xD - 04-12-2008 (04-12-2008, 09:34 PM)HaZe link Wrote: alliances are so lame. this is what kills the gang action at LVP.. everyone teaming up. everyone needs to hold their own ground for a great LVP gang experience. srsly dont even bother with alliances.. they bring conflict and boredom. you're in a gang for a reason, to watch each other and work together. You're not supposed to have a tea party with every f***ing gang in LVP. just my 2 cents/me swings around I liked the part about the tea party.
Re: Street's Diciples [D] - Jay - 04-12-2008 (04-12-2008, 09:34 PM)HaZe link Wrote: alliances are so lame. this is what kills the gang action at LVP.. everyone teaming up. everyone needs to hold their own ground for a great LVP gang experience. srsly dont even bother with alliances.. they bring conflict and boredom. you're in a gang for a reason, to watch each other and work together. You're not supposed to have a tea party with every f***ing gang in LVP. just my 2 cents EDIT: nvm was drunk Re: Street's Diciples [D] - Arno - 04-13-2008 GL ya'dig Re: Street's Diciples [D] - Agent - 04-13-2008 (04-12-2008, 08:39 PM)mjaa link Wrote: i don't wanna be allied with CT.. But i don't care if scoop reev inf and more from D is joining CT. That's there's choice. As i know , CT and D were aliied for life lol . since D were MI/LVF/CHC/H ..there were allways allied with CT , but CT werent active that time ..so now when its back to life there still allied .. Re: Street's Diciples [D] - Fredling - 04-13-2008 (04-13-2008, 09:12 AM)Agent link Wrote: As i know , CT and D were aliied for life lol . since D were MI/LVF/CHC/H ..there were allways allied with CT , but CT werent active that time ..so now when its back to life there still allied ..Yea, but D never was MI/LVF/CHC/H... H is one clan, D is another. How can that be so hard to understand |