![]() |
|
Post your computr spec here! - Printable Version +- Las Venturas Playground (https://forum.sa-mp.nl) +-- Forum: Miscellaneous (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: General Talk (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-24.html) +--- Thread: Post your computr spec here! (/thread-4364.html) |
Re: Post your computr spec here! - Maka - 08-10-2008 OS: WinXP Professional 5.1 SP2 (Build #2600) (Dell) CPU: Intel Pentium D , 2.99 GHz, 0KB Video: NVIDIA GeForce 7300 LE (1024x768x32bpp 60Hz) Sound: SB X-Fi Audio [CCE0] HD: Free: 253.45 GB/298.00 GB Connection: Intel® PRO/1000 PL Network Connection - Pakketplanner-minipoort @ 100.0 Mbps (Rec: 199.21MB Sent: 14.16MB) >.> Re: Post your computr spec here! - Peter - 08-12-2008 Quote:Dacads link=topic=4654.msg135643#msg135643 date=1218376737] There are no Pentium 4 Quad Core processors. Especially none running at 3 Ghz. Re: Post your computr spec here! - [UvH]Hitman - 08-12-2008 Yes. A Pentium 4 Quad CPU with 2 CPUS? LOL. There is just one serie with dual Pentium4- GPUs, the Pentium D. Which has nothing to do with the Core2 Technology, the Pentium D is based on the Netburst technology, which sucks. Your Processor sucks. I bet your RAM sucks, because it does not run in dualchannel (it runs in dualchannel if you have 2x 1024 and 2x 512MB ). Your CPU sucks again, it was not made for gaming. :-)BTW, the Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 is now on the same price level as the Q9450 in germany, ~245€ Re: Post your computr spec here! - mjaa - 08-18-2008 Lets do a test ![]() Edit: find a easyer test. this will rate your computer and give u are score: http://service.futuremark.com/virtualmark/start.action My score: 11600 http://service.futuremark.com/home.action?resultId=207493&resultType=22 Re: Post your computr spec here! - [UvH]Hitman - 08-18-2008 Futuremark sucks. 3Dmark sucks. Vantage sucks. Virtualmark sucks too. The points you get dont count, the power in games does. If i have a Quadcore 4x 3GHz i have in the Vantage test (or any other) about 3000-5000 points more, but ingame i have the same FPS like a dualcore with 2x 3GHz, because only 2-3 games support Quads. Tests are nonsense
Re: Post your computr spec here! - Zezima - 08-18-2008 where i finde my comp specs ? lol Re: Post your computr spec here! - mjaa - 08-18-2008 Quote:Hitman link=topic=4654.msg137427#msg137427 date=1219046711] Too bad sa-mp doesn't include a benchmark test ![]() It's not the our diffrent graphic cards we compare here, its our computers. And like you said, futuremark gives you more points for a quad for example. Because its better ![]() Re: Post your computr spec here! - [UvH]Hitman - 08-18-2008 It is not better. Its more expensive ![]() I bet 99.9% of all gamers wouldnt feel the difference between a Q9650 (4x 3GHz) and a E8400 (2x 3GHz), because no games has a big profit of quads. And maybe 5 have ANY profit of quads, mostly 1-5%. Quads for gamers are nonsense, because so less games support it. But its usual for graphics design, video encoding, photo-editing and stuff. Its made for this kind of applications, not for games Re: Post your computr spec here! - mjaa - 08-18-2008 Quote:Hitman link=topic=4654.msg137526#msg137526 date=1219073931] The quad has more cashe and windows can still use the 2 other cores to other stuff like antivirus etc when you are gaming so you got 2 free cores to game with. So i think more then 0.1 would feel diffrent ![]() And like i said, futumark gives point of what computer you got.. not the best game fps. And its our computers we compare here ![]() Re: Post your computr spec here! - ayam - 08-18-2008 Your computer's fasteness also depends on the hardwares you are using, take that into account. I can get like 80+ FPS in COD4 and C&C3.
|