Communication

[Matthias]

Hai there,

Well, I've been checking the 'Open for discussion' & CSI board lately, and I've noticed that many ideas get approved, but don't happen, or don't get discussed at all.

I suggest we discuss an idea before approving it (most likely in .dev) and then approve it. Because I don't see the new jail getting back, or the LVP vs Terrorist idea getting done.

Opinions please?

Matthias

[Jay]

I think the Open for Discussion section should be changed. No topics should be moved to that section unless other players' input is really necessary, for example, if we're having a public vote about a change, such as the old skins.  There's no need for others to reply to a topic with "yeh I agree" like 90% of people do. Open for discussion doesn't necessarily mean it's approved, in fact I can't see one major idea in that board that has ever made it to LVP.

I don't normally read replies in that board, I just read the start post.

EDIT: And about the old jail, we discussed that in .dev already and it has a ticket

[Sander]

There's no need for others to reply to a topic with "yeh I agree" like 90% of people do.

Agreed.
I never understood why it changed. When we started with the CSI section, it was never meant to be like this.

1 > Topic in CSI.
2a > Dev/Management agree/disagree.
2b > Need player input? Move topic for discussion.
3 > Wait.