07-16-2018, 12:11 PM
I don't know what match you were watching cuz I didn't see the same things:
1- You have more SHOTS not SHOTS ON TARGET which ultimately means your possession was useless and your attacks weren't dangerous.
2- Our goal conversion rate is far better than yours which also means that although we didn't have that many attacks, almost all of them were possible goals unlike yours and your shots to the crowd.
3- Croatia-France in an open match: we would probably loose, why? you have the best midfield in the world and I don't think anyone can contest that which is why yesterday's match was a defensive game for France. You're delusional if you don't realise we gave possession away purposefully and focused on counter-attacks.
4- First goal was a dive but I'm not complaining (you wouldn't if the roles were reversed and I would probably but that's how it is). Penalty is a penalty without any doubts as Persic's hand was extended.
5- I don't care if your goalie wasn't up to the task (in your opinion), he is part of your team and you have to accept that.
In short, you weren't dangerous this game and that's because you lost in terms of tactics and that cost you. This is my opinion and I believe it is the general opinion and analysis of the game. Again, now that I am not drunk, I wouldn't have been sad if you guys had won because you had a legendary run in this world cup
(And Croatia can beat Brazil ten times in a row without batting an eye, I don't know why Brazilians always bring up their 5 cup titles when they fuck up, it is a sour excuse for playing shit football.)
ALLEZZ LES BLEUS!
1- You have more SHOTS not SHOTS ON TARGET which ultimately means your possession was useless and your attacks weren't dangerous.
2- Our goal conversion rate is far better than yours which also means that although we didn't have that many attacks, almost all of them were possible goals unlike yours and your shots to the crowd.
3- Croatia-France in an open match: we would probably loose, why? you have the best midfield in the world and I don't think anyone can contest that which is why yesterday's match was a defensive game for France. You're delusional if you don't realise we gave possession away purposefully and focused on counter-attacks.
4- First goal was a dive but I'm not complaining (you wouldn't if the roles were reversed and I would probably but that's how it is). Penalty is a penalty without any doubts as Persic's hand was extended.
5- I don't care if your goalie wasn't up to the task (in your opinion), he is part of your team and you have to accept that.
In short, you weren't dangerous this game and that's because you lost in terms of tactics and that cost you. This is my opinion and I believe it is the general opinion and analysis of the game. Again, now that I am not drunk, I wouldn't have been sad if you guys had won because you had a legendary run in this world cup
(And Croatia can beat Brazil ten times in a row without batting an eye, I don't know why Brazilians always bring up their 5 cup titles when they fuck up, it is a sour excuse for playing shit football.)
ALLEZZ LES BLEUS!