Hello There, Guest! Login or Register


[idea]A new "Ramp laming" rule?
#18
I've thought about it:

Exteding the safezone will only move the problerm (and putting an escape vehicle in the safezone will be lame !)
You cant make it a rule cuz it's to hard to keep track of.

U can just taxi out!
And when ppl let their bullets fly over the ramp 2 much, just loose som health somhow (wont be 2 diffucult with all those ramplamers)
and go stand near the border, next thing u know the autojail function will be ur friend and force ppl to fight somwhere else.

But thos ramplamers only get themselves with it, cuz there are more ramplamres and they will shoot eachother, the target of the ramplamer will move into the safezone quick so mostly they just damage ppl and don't make kills and ppl will start to dislike u! (can i have a pluspoint please?)

And if u are far away from the ramp and fight there ppl cant run into the safezone, you wont per accdent kill som1 and get jailed, no third party will run in when u have only 3 hp left to finish u off and ppl will like u better (hey did i get a pluspoint?)

The only good way is to adress the honour and common sence off ppl and politely request them to stop or refer the to this topic to give their own vieuw on it.

So the rules should be treated with normal common sence and just for the record i should note that i've never seen somone grant a plupoint for rampbehavoir!
Reply


Messages In This Thread
[idea]A new "Ramp laming" rule? - by Navar0x - 03-02-2007, 04:46 AM
Re: A new "Ramp laming" rule? - by Vulkanyaz - 03-02-2007, 08:01 AM
Re: A new "Ramp laming" rule? - by XL - 03-02-2007, 09:29 AM
Re: A new "Ramp laming" rule? - by [GoT]cooolkast - 03-02-2007, 09:50 AM
Re: A new "Ramp laming" rule? - by Badeend - 03-02-2007, 10:21 AM
Re: A new "Ramp laming" rule? - by estroe - 03-02-2007, 01:26 PM
Re: A new "Ramp laming" rule? - by Navar0x - 03-02-2007, 01:28 PM
Re: A new "Ramp laming" rule? - by cannabis - 03-02-2007, 04:09 PM
Re: A new "Ramp laming" rule? - by Makaveli - 03-02-2007, 04:29 PM
Re: A new "Ramp laming" rule? - by tomozj - 03-02-2007, 06:13 PM
Re: A new "Ramp laming" rule? - by [BA]PennyWise - 03-02-2007, 06:17 PM
Re: A new "Ramp laming" rule? - by Makaveli - 03-02-2007, 09:42 PM
Re: A new "Ramp laming" rule? - by __Katie__ - 03-03-2007, 10:52 PM
Re: A new "Ramp laming" rule? - by Vulkanyaz - 03-04-2007, 12:31 AM
Re: A new "Ramp laming" rule? - by zeeuwse_boer - 03-04-2007, 01:53 PM
Re: A new "Ramp laming" rule? - by tBKwtWS - 03-04-2007, 10:16 PM
Re: A new "Ramp laming" rule? - by tomozj - 03-05-2007, 04:50 PM
Re: A new "Ramp laming" rule? - by tBKwtWS - 03-08-2007, 02:20 PM
Re: A new "Ramp laming" rule? - by tomozj - 03-08-2007, 05:26 PM
Re: A new "Ramp laming" rule? - by zeeuwse_boer - 03-08-2007, 05:58 PM
Re: [idea]A new "Ramp laming" rule? - by tBKwtWS - 03-13-2007, 08:56 AM
Re: [idea]A new "Ramp laming" rule? - by Tmuts - 03-13-2007, 09:34 AM