02-12-2008, 04:04 AM
Keep in mind this isn't a full-fledged suggestion, just putting it up there as a concept we could work around.
What I'm concerned about mostly is the length of the duel. We ideally wouldn't want to have both parts in a single duel, right? I'm thinking the person who challenges someone else, the challenger, would have to chase. The challenged person would have to dodge.
Then that would only flip if the old challenger accepted a challenge from the old challenged person.
So A challenges B.
B accepts.
A starts chasing B.
B successfully evades for the time. B wins. END.
B crashes, or A gets ahead. A wins. END
Either of them time out. Both are refunded. END.
B declines.
A gets their money back. END
What I'm concerned about mostly is the length of the duel. We ideally wouldn't want to have both parts in a single duel, right? I'm thinking the person who challenges someone else, the challenger, would have to chase. The challenged person would have to dodge.
Then that would only flip if the old challenger accepted a challenge from the old challenged person.
So A challenges B.
B accepts.
A starts chasing B.
B successfully evades for the time. B wins. END.
B crashes, or A gets ahead. A wins. END
Either of them time out. Both are refunded. END.
B declines.
A gets their money back. END