11-02-2016, 05:54 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-02-2016, 06:00 PM by TEF Edited 7 times in total.)
(11-02-2016, 05:34 PM)Harambe Wrote: I'm against this, i think it doesn't suit the server's purpose: deathmatch (even though freeroam is another one)You know, I've found it interesting how the same was said about houses and yet now every single fighter has at least one.

In addition, I think it is important to realize that freeroam attributes are just as fundamental to Las Venturas Playground as those appropriated to deathmatch players. To say that the sole focus should be on deathmatch is to go against our fine line (between deathmatch and freeroam) that we have been balancing for over a decade.
(11-02-2016, 05:34 PM)Harambe Wrote: Plus, if a player wants to be granted invincibility, all they have to do (most of the time ) is kindly ask using @Yes, but that invincibility does not lend itself well to anti-abuse measures, and it limits the player to however long said administrator is online. The suggested "passive mode" would allow players the possibility to enjoy the main world of the server with everyone else (avoiding isolation in, say, a virtual world) at any time, provided the above criteria are met.
I appreciate your input, Harambe, though I am curious if you have any specific concerns regarding this suggestion.
![[Image: RDNHLt3.png]](http://i.imgur.com/RDNHLt3.png)