03-08-2016, 08:24 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-08-2016, 08:29 PM by Mr.DeHsHaT)
I agree ban durations vary from case-to-case, keeping in mind the history, behavior, kicks, bans etc. It also depends on ones personal discretion, and bonding admins in strict rules is not an option, but atleast there should be some regulations, someone supervising them, Admins should not be equal to Gods.
And about personal discretion, there is a limit to these things. A judge in a court, sentencing someone may leave a first time small thief with a warning and fine, But he never spares a first time murder just bcz its his first time.
Same is the case on server , a first time bug abuse or small misunderstandings can go with a warning or small bans. But if admin knows someone is hacking, then the punishment should be same for all , considering past bans. AND, if the admin is not -sure-enough for a long ban, then why to ban at all??
Edit- And also make the admins clear , that they need the server, not the other way around. Anyone who feel being pressed by any rules or supervising, then they may feel free to leave. A bad crew is worse than no crew.
And about personal discretion, there is a limit to these things. A judge in a court, sentencing someone may leave a first time small thief with a warning and fine, But he never spares a first time murder just bcz its his first time.
Same is the case on server , a first time bug abuse or small misunderstandings can go with a warning or small bans. But if admin knows someone is hacking, then the punishment should be same for all , considering past bans. AND, if the admin is not -sure-enough for a long ban, then why to ban at all??
Edit- And also make the admins clear , that they need the server, not the other way around. Anyone who feel being pressed by any rules or supervising, then they may feel free to leave. A bad crew is worse than no crew.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media.giphy.com/media/3o7yjciXW2FYfSXVcc/giphy.gif)