Hello There, Guest! Login or Register


[S] Anti-spam suggestion
#25
(12-13-2009, 05:12 PM)Richard link Wrote: But we don't have it "mute" your commands. And being constantly kicked for spamming is nice? :P

I know you don't have it to mute your commands, but on my original server the auto-mute stops the player from using commands, making it even more annoying, and so being blocked from using commands can be annoying, no where near a kick, no, but once it happens a lot it can be annoying, making the player think before he spams OR abuses commands.

(12-13-2009, 05:12 PM)Richard link Wrote: I still don't agree with that. Sure crashing makes you lose it, doesn't make it nice though.

I never said it was nice, I said when we crash we lose our weapons and sometimes our properties too, unless the savehandler has been fixed, and so being kicked makes no to little difference to a crash except for the fact that a kick means you've broken rules which for some people is the worst thing in the world (has an effect on their wishes to become Admin :P).

(12-13-2009, 05:12 PM)Richard link Wrote: World abuse is a whole different issue. We don't have a restriction on command usage by a mute.

I know world abuse is a different issue, but since this suggestion is obviously going nowhere I thought while on the subject of auto-mute, it could be used to tackle world abuse. Of course you don't have a restriction on command usage by a mute, that's why I'm suggesting this, I wouldn't suggest something that exists, would I? Okay maybe you can restrict that mute to the /world command or perhaps other abusable commands, but not all (would get annoying when selling properties or withdrawing multiple sums of money to upgrade the bank and such).

The auto-mute for spam is just getting denied no matter how much effort I put into trying to get it put in, but at least think about the auto-mute for command abuse for those that can and does get used to evade deaths.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
[S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Munch - 11-20-2009, 07:02 AM
Re: [S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Matthias - 11-20-2009, 07:03 AM
Re: [S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Munch - 11-20-2009, 07:15 AM
Re: [S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Matthias - 11-20-2009, 07:38 AM
Re: [S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Munch - 11-20-2009, 07:47 AM
Re: [S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Munch - 11-22-2009, 05:51 PM
Re: [S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Matthias - 11-22-2009, 06:42 PM
Re: [S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Munch - 11-22-2009, 10:13 PM
Re: [S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Munch - 12-11-2009, 06:07 PM
Re: [S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Richard - 12-11-2009, 06:09 PM
Re: [S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Munch - 12-11-2009, 06:16 PM
Re: [S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Richard - 12-11-2009, 07:28 PM
Re: [S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Munch - 12-11-2009, 07:43 PM
Re: [S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Richard - 12-12-2009, 01:47 AM
Re: [S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Munch - 12-12-2009, 02:01 AM
Re: [S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Richard - 12-12-2009, 03:20 PM
Re: [S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Munch - 12-12-2009, 05:45 PM
Re: [S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Richard - 12-12-2009, 06:28 PM
Re: [S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Munch - 12-12-2009, 08:30 PM
Re: [S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Richard - 12-13-2009, 01:14 PM
Re: [S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Munch - 12-13-2009, 04:30 PM
Re: [S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Richard - 12-13-2009, 04:36 PM
Re: [S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Munch - 12-13-2009, 04:49 PM
Re: [S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Richard - 12-13-2009, 05:12 PM
Re: [S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Munch - 12-14-2009, 06:19 PM
Re: [S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Richard - 12-14-2009, 07:08 PM
Re: [S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Munch - 12-14-2009, 09:42 PM
Re: [S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Richard - 12-14-2009, 10:11 PM
Re: [S] Anti-spam suggestion - by Munch - 12-14-2009, 11:10 PM