Hello There, Guest! Login or Register


A change for 0.2
#33
In fact, LVP 2.6 was never meant to be developed.
2.5 was the latest planned release before LVP 3.0.

And ok, to explain it: this is/was the idea of almost a half year ago.
There will 3 gangbases, on in each large city.
Maybe also a few "town"bases, but that's not sure.
Each gangbase will have it's own benefit.
Like one may have free weapons, the other can have health generating, the other gives money.

So, if you want all the benefits, be sure that you are in control of 3 gangbases.
If you control all the gangbases you are in control of whole San Andreas. Maybe we should reward it with lower tax/getting tax of other people, or something like that.

This can be changed, maybe there are nicer things to do with the new 0.2 gangzones.


Messages In This Thread
A change for 0.2 - by benbmyers - 06-07-2007, 09:18 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by fat0 - 06-07-2007, 11:08 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by benbmyers - 06-07-2007, 11:13 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by Joeri - 06-08-2007, 07:09 AM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by TurkeyStar* - 06-08-2007, 09:00 AM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by Barry - 06-08-2007, 10:48 AM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by Joeri - 06-08-2007, 01:44 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by zeeuwse_boer - 06-08-2007, 02:13 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by fat0 - 06-08-2007, 02:20 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by Joeri - 06-08-2007, 02:48 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by estroe - 06-08-2007, 02:50 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by benbmyers - 06-08-2007, 03:29 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by Makaveli - 06-08-2007, 03:37 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by [BA]PennyWise - 06-08-2007, 03:51 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by Joeri - 06-08-2007, 03:55 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by Nakebod - 06-08-2007, 05:05 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by benbmyers - 06-08-2007, 11:27 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by [GoT]Razor - 06-09-2007, 10:11 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by tomozj - 06-09-2007, 10:58 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by benbmyers - 06-09-2007, 11:07 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by cloakster - 06-10-2007, 03:48 AM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by tomozj - 06-10-2007, 10:32 AM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by benbmyers - 06-10-2007, 11:08 AM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by tomozj - 06-10-2007, 05:59 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by benbmyers - 06-10-2007, 06:36 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by tomozj - 06-10-2007, 10:37 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by [GoT]Razor - 06-10-2007, 10:49 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by benbmyers - 06-10-2007, 11:13 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by Nakebod - 06-11-2007, 12:15 AM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by benbmyers - 06-11-2007, 01:15 AM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by tomozj - 06-11-2007, 01:28 AM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by benbmyers - 06-11-2007, 01:42 AM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by Nakebod - 06-11-2007, 10:19 AM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by [BA]PennyWise - 06-11-2007, 03:56 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by benbmyers - 06-11-2007, 04:00 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by [BA]PennyWise - 06-11-2007, 04:04 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by Nakebod - 06-11-2007, 06:45 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by [GoT]Razor - 06-11-2007, 07:02 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by tomozj - 06-11-2007, 07:42 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by [GoT]Razor - 06-11-2007, 07:49 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by benbmyers - 06-11-2007, 08:07 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by Chillosophy - 06-12-2007, 04:21 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by estroe - 06-12-2007, 04:36 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by [BA]PennyWise - 06-12-2007, 04:54 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by TurkeyStar* - 06-12-2007, 05:01 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by benbmyers - 06-12-2007, 06:34 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by [BA]PennyWise - 06-12-2007, 06:36 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by benbmyers - 06-12-2007, 06:55 PM
Re: A change for 0.2 - by tomozj - 06-12-2007, 07:11 PM