12-20-2008, 01:59 PM
I'm getting somewhat tired of this.
First time you got banned, the excuse "I didn't know the rules" might have been valid, however, this is the second time. You were told to read the rules, evidently failed to do so, and got banned of yet another rule which you could, should have known about. You are saying it is our fault due to not warning you in advance, something on which I strongly beg to differ for the earlier stated cause.
And how exactly do you know there was no reason? To my knowledge you have no way to read the admin-chat or insight in the events that led to the conclusion of the Administrator. To conclude; whether or not you believe certain bugs can lead to a fair fight is not in any way related to your ban appeal, I suggest you do so elsewhere.
First time you got banned, the excuse "I didn't know the rules" might have been valid, however, this is the second time. You were told to read the rules, evidently failed to do so, and got banned of yet another rule which you could, should have known about. You are saying it is our fault due to not warning you in advance, something on which I strongly beg to differ for the earlier stated cause.
Quote:Maybe you don't do it without a reason but i saw and experienced admins that did nuked someon without a good acceptable reason like cheking if someon is healthcheating.
And how exactly do you know there was no reason? To my knowledge you have no way to read the admin-chat or insight in the events that led to the conclusion of the Administrator. To conclude; whether or not you believe certain bugs can lead to a fair fight is not in any way related to your ban appeal, I suggest you do so elsewhere.