Tight admins

[Maddolis]

I understand all of the above posts (pretty good for foreigners ).

I feel I must still press the point that the admins should make an attempt to react to various circumstances (flaming, for example) in a similar way.
Of course, no two admins are the same, and I nor anybody else can ask anyone to, because everyone's unique (etc etc). However, admins should react similarly to avoid being seen as "biased" (omgomg admin A muted me for "you suck balls" but you're not muting fighter A for "fuck you"? omg admin abuse).

Although in the long run I disagree with the harsh penalties for flaming, I do agree that the action should take place now- and after LVP's crewmembers govern the community harshly for a couple of weeks, and the LVP environment undergoes a noticable change, then I'd suggest you consider uplifting the tight administrating. Of course, we (I feel funny saying "we" as I do flame in self defence, and tend to regret "overreacting" half the time) have not achieved that goal quite yet- but once the environment is lighter then perhaps the occasional expletive would be fine, in this a)game for b)adults.

Summing up my argument:
a) I still think muting me for "crybaby" is far too harsh. Words like "idiot" "crybaby" "fool" "silly man" or whatever shouldn't be mutable, unless completely spammed over the course of a minute or something.
b) Same with that "use english" mute. Seriously...
c) I agree with the harsh policy only as a temporary action- if the environment doesn't lighten up, then perhaps a new strategy could be suggested (lets stay with this one for a while though).
d) 90% of Peter's shirts are noticably stained with sweet-chilli-sauce.

To infinity and beyond(?),
Maddolis.

On top of that, despite knowing that the whole "you didn't talk English"-story isn't really what Nakebod meant

Actually I asked him afterwards and that was what he meant (I hadn't sworn for many minutes before anyway).