LVP3 Discussion

[TEF]

Can I have an apartment there?

Screw your apartment, all I'm asking for is a shotgun house. 

[tomozj]

i wanna be a tester for 3.0 plzzzzz

We've already got a sticky for that, and you have to post in there in the correct format.

I feel that it's not only about what you think will be included in LVP3, but what would you want to see in it?

I know I'd like to see some different kinds of minigames.. Something to keep the regulars going, you know?

[tomozj]

Merged this LVP discussion topic with the other one. If there are any post mixups, then that is why.

[Ben]

i wanna be a tester for 3.0 plzzzzz

Dont worry, you tested our ban command.

I feel that a playground has some flaws in itself. Firstly, if we have DM'ers and roleplayers, the DM'ers will just go after the roleplayers making their experience terrible. Fair enough we could have like, another world for roleplaying which cant be accessed unless you have the correct rp name (Firstname_Lastname) or something like that. Lots of RP features could be added i guess.

@ Jay. Why cant you parachute in mta?

[tomozj]

MTA doesn't use SCM. To put this simply, that means MTA has no ammunations, no casinos, no mod shops, maybe no interior markers, but most importantly no parachute stuff.

[Ben]

no interiors?. Thats a bummer. That would mean we would have to change quite alot of things.

[tomozj]

No interior _markers_, they have to be scripted in. Quite annoying really, but maybe the MTA team could script them in or something by default. We'll see.

[Chan]

its because its Developers Preview.

The Real MTA DM is still now out.

[tomozj]

What? The SCM stuff isn't in because MTA isn't based on SCM, not because they didn't get around to it.

So it's not because this is only a developer preview..

[Gunslinger2]

I tried MTA before SA-MP, and I personally much preferred SA-MP.

I find it less laggy and closer to the single player game - whereas MTA seemed excessively buggy, and completely lacking in features from the single player game.