New "rule" for gangs - Discussion

[Sander]

Hi.

In this topic you can discus the new "rule" as mentioned in http://forum.sa-mp.nl/index.php?topic=693.0

[BassiedeClown]

good  :>

[Richard]

Good you'd told us, never thought about it

[JUTD]

Or have some respect

[tomozj]

Yeah. What about just under 40? Like 37ish.

Anyway - great 'rule', it's common sense really

-tj

[Sander]

Well, have to put a line somewhere
And 40 is probably a good line for this.

[cloakster]

I would say it all depends on how many admins are online.

[__Katie__]

True... 40 players against one admin isn't fair. 

It would take at least 60  :7 

Katie 

[XL]

I'm sorry if I haven't read correctly.

    * Drive around and kill people when needed.

The last option is in most cases the best option.
You can detect speedhackers, healthcheaters, airbreaks, and more.
A lot of mods/admins are choosing for the second option.

Speedhackers are always so fast that you can't follow them, you can't kill healthcheaters, I don't know what airbreaks are.

Ok, so you killed one, and then? If you kill an healthcheater he isn't healthcheating then. If you can't kill the healthcheater then you still have to wait for an admin to kick it? And you still didn't use the last option.

Sorry if my questions are dumb, it's just makes no sense to me at all. How can you detect an cheater or ban it by killing then?

[tomozj]

Airbreaks = super break (stops instantly).

And also, what if people are de-synced? Can they get banned for that?

-tj