IoU - IownU

[SolidRock]

So as a far as I understand, the IoU tag is to be used by the very good players of LVP, but it's not a clan. So someone can still be in a clan and wear the IoU tag?

[Munch]

Why a dumb question? In one sense it would be dumb to test them, 'cos they are undeniably good fighters. But just curious.. Gl..

Well you may not know how good Violax is as he isn't that active now, and you're new. And Hoff is your clanmate so YOU will know how 'good' he is. But Firm wouldn't, as he's still pretty new (about 5 months new at least). And so he should test everyone, no exceptions. And that way he gets a good idea of what his members are like when he recruits them.

[Ph03n1x]

Well you may not know how good Violax is as he isn't that active now, and you're new. And Hoff is your clanmate so YOU will know how 'good' he is. But Firm wouldn't, as he's still pretty new (about 5 months new at least). And so he should test everyone, no exceptions. And that way he gets a good idea of what his members are like when he recruits them.

Yeah, I know I post too much, but ehh, sue me. So:

[verbal diarrhea]
http://forum.sa-mp.nl/index.php?topic=13...#msg147718

http://sampforum.ubercrue.com/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=463#463 (pages 2 & 3)

I think this counts as documented evidence/proof that the two fighters mentioned are good. I also know that Firm is good.

I'm just trying to get my head around the idea. So far it seems to be people that Firm thinks are good based on an arbitrary assesment of skills by himself. Fair enough. I'm not sure how qualified someone who doesn't know how good the reputedly best player/players in LVP are, is to judge who is good or not, but no big deal.

I do think beating Firm in a first to five would have been a sounder scale because given that Firm is good, then being able to beat him must mean you are good also. Please note that last time I fought him a week or so ago, he beat me quite soundly, so I'm not making any comment about myself being good or not here; and I'm not going to apply for this; but I would have been happier submitting to a first to five test rather, being more objective and less subjective to arbitrary personal opinion of Firm or his mood that day towards you or in general.

And yes, I agree that testing everyone regardless of reputation is a good idea, but I don't think the test intended would be very objective.

[/verbal diarrhea]

[bAd CaT]

[iou]

Yeah, I know I post too much, but ehh, sue me. So:

[verbal diarrhea]
http://forum.sa-mp.nl/index.php?topic=13...#msg147718

http://sampforum.ubercrue.com/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=463#463 (pages 2 & 3)

I think this counts as documented evidence/proof that the two fighters mentioned are good. I also know that Firm is good.

I'm just trying to get my head around the idea. So far it seems to be people that Firm thinks are good based on an arbitrary assesment of skills by himself. Fair enough. I'm not sure how qualified someone who doesn't know how good the reputedly best player/players in LVP are, is to judge who is good or not, but no big deal.

I do think beating Firm in a first to five would have been a sounder scale because given that Firm is good, then being able to beat him must mean you are good also. Please note that last time I fought him a week or so ago, he beat me quite soundly, so I'm not making any comment about myself being good or not here; and I'm not going to apply for this; but I would have been happier submitting to a first to five test rather, being more objective and less subjective to arbitrary personal opinion of Firm or his mood that day towards you or in general.

And yes, I agree that testing everyone regardless of reputation is a good idea, but I don't think the test intended would be very objective.

[/verbal diarrhea]

I wish i was that good at english D:
Well my thought was that i fight them, observe how they fight and their aim.
It sure shows alot more then a first to 5.
Because in fights people can be lucky, but if I can see how they fight and how good their aim is constantly (no lucky shots), I think that proves alot more then a few lucky duels.

Solid_Rock link=topic=18840.msg206370#msg206370 date=1241128910]
So as a far as I understand, the IoU tag is to be used by the very good players of LVP, but it's not a clan. So someone can still be in a clan and wear the IoU tag?

Yes.

Well you may not know how good Violax is as he isn't that active now, and you're new. And Hoff is your clanmate so YOU will know how 'good' he is. But Firm wouldn't, as he's still pretty new (about 5 months new at least). And so he should test everyone, no exceptions. And that way he gets a good idea of what his members are like when he recruits them.

I do know how good they are, I've fought both and I fought Violax the most.
He sure rapes at fighting, Hoff too, but I can still win over them. Not always noway.

But I would still test everyone to treat all the players fair. 

[[W]TR1pin]

Dude, dont be the next shoru and stop the spamming in this forums. Your almost as spammy as Tr1pin

Well well, your almost as gay as European Football........

[Shark]

Say that to a fucking hooligan and then post here what happened.

[Hatimat2]

GL with your gang

[FarePak]

GL with your gang

Not a gang

[Ph03n1x]

I wish i was that good at english D:
Well my thought was that i fight them, observe how they fight and their aim.
It sure shows alot more then a first to 5.
Because in fights people can be lucky, but if I can see how they fight and how good their aim is constantly (no lucky shots), I think that proves alot more then a few lucky duels.

Hmmm, its true that a duel can be won by lucky shots, but winning five duels sooner than your opponent surely rules out luck as the deciding factor, in favour of skill? For example, if I hit a treble twenty once it could be luck, but if I hit it 5 times out of 8 it is surely skill.

But yeah, shoru ftw, lawl.

Well well, your almost as gay as European Football........

(Note: I respect soccer, but that was funny man.)