+- Las Venturas Playground (https://forum.sa-mp.nl)
+-- Forum: Main Talk (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: Las Venturas Playground (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-9.html)
+--- Thread: properties (/thread-21827.html)
properties - BLiTz - 12-10-2009
why many of properties had changed their income?
Re: properties - Hitman - 12-10-2009
so you cant earn 500 mill per day anymore
Re: properties - Jay - 12-10-2009
I changed them. The property earnings are absolutely ridiculous. There are going to be some changes to the command to set earnings because it's just getting abused by crew. One property was under the ramp, and earned 600k...
Re: properties - Matthias - 12-11-2009
The development team is changing some earnings, since you can earn way too much, as Jay mentioned.
Re: properties - Future - 12-14-2009
I agree with lowering earnings, but now some have ridiculous low earnings (Jays Development Center 2.000.000 / 15.000), while some remained with high earnings (estroe emo property 2.000.000 / 200.000, Maka's Rave 5.000.000 / 500.000), this increases unbalance. I want ALL properties to be reviewed!
In my opinion, all properties with more than 2 millions must have earnings between 1/40-1/20 while cheaper properties must have between 1/10/1-20.
Anybody saw this message?
(11-10-2009, 05:50 AM)Future link Wrote: Properties:
There are 180 properties, probably enough, but most of them are rarely bought, the hunting is only for a small number of properties, so a lot of players swearing when their properties are bought by others.
I identified a lot of interesting places, where I suggest to put new properties. South and East areas of Los Santos have very few properties. How about the lighthouse? Contact me in-game to show more places!
Some properties are rather useless, because are placed in very, very isolated places, hardly to get, and have too low earnings per minute to attract hunters, sometimes the earnings are low as 1/100 from property price. Examples: CIA Hideout (? / ?), GTA-Host Headquarters (95.000 / 9.500), Hidden Cave (50.000 / 3.750), MTA's Development Central (35.000 / 3.500), Naked's Beach Club (? / ?), San Andreas Garbage Dump (52.500 / 3.250), San Fierro Golf Club (65.000 / 6.500), Stef's Shady Railwaybridge Spot (500.000 / 5.000).
A lot of properties have exaggerated earnings, even more than 1/10 of property price. Examples: Hidden Pond (1.000.000 / 120.000), if someone buys it after 10 minutes, the investition is already recovered plus you get back almost half of the price. Matthias Place For Chitters must be deleted because is too atractive and too easier to get from introduction of /visit.
Re: properties - Mike - 12-14-2009
It can take about 4 hours to review and adjust each property in LVP.
Re: properties - Munch - 12-15-2009
(12-14-2009, 06:42 PM)Future link Wrote: I agree with lowering earnings, but now some have ridiculous low earnings (Jays Development Center 2.000.000 / 15.000), while some remained with high earnings (estroe emo property 2.000.000 / 200.000, Maka's Rave 5.000.000 / 500.000), this increases unbalance. I want ALL properties to be reviewed!
In my opinion, all properties with more than 2 millions must have earnings between 1/40-1/20 while cheaper properties must have between 1/10/1-20.
Anybody saw this message?
Damn if you had WhatPulse you'd beat Peter in no time.
Re: properties - Jay - 12-16-2009
Properties are being reviewed, that's all I can say for now, you'll hear more soon.
Re: properties - Gibbs - 12-22-2009
Great, raises the value of money in LVP
