![]() |
|
[S] New listed rule - Printable Version +- Las Venturas Playground (https://forum.sa-mp.nl) +-- Forum: Main Talk (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: Complaints & Reports (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-20.html) +---- Forum: Dealt With Complaints (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-21.html) +---- Thread: [S] New listed rule (/thread-17610.html) |
[S] New listed rule - xmob - 04-16-2009 I often see ban appeals by people who have been banned for spamming. They often state that they weren't spamming. Maybe it would help to officially list "flooding" as an offence. That way, players can be banned for "flooding" when repeating themselves and there is no argument. Just a thought. Re: [S] New listed rule - Richard - 04-16-2009 Logs say enough. If we say they're flooding, they're flooding. Simple as that. Although a simple extra line couldn't harm anything. Re: [S] New listed rule - xmob - 04-16-2009 Yes, that's what I mean. Often people get banned for flooding, but they're told it was for spamming. They then argue that they were not spamming. Keeping a distinction between spamming and flooding will stop those arguments. Re: [S] New listed rule - Richard - 04-16-2009 I honestly don't care if they are going to argue about the definition
|