+- Las Venturas Playground (https://forum.sa-mp.nl)
+-- Forum: Main Talk (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: Development (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-16.html)
+--- Thread: [Feature] /spy (/thread-12465.html)
[Feature] /spy - Turkey - 09-14-2008
Just had this idea:
You can watch someone like the admins do, but the time is limited to a minute(?) and you have to pay $x for it.
You can only use it every x mins.
What do you think?
Re: [Feature] /spy - FarePak - 09-14-2008
Not bad idea, I'd say around 1 million to do this.
Re: [Feature] /spy - HaZe - 09-14-2008
i like it.
Re: [Feature] /spy - Ben - 09-14-2008
I don't like it. I like the ability of bein able to hide from someone, and players could abuse it to see if admins are watching someone. Also, players would moan in a situation like this (Let me try to explain in detail, its complicated)
Player A is just about to fight, so player B activates FRAPS and types /spy. Player B records it and says i was him. Player A gets med...
Re: [Feature] /spy - Wesley - 09-14-2008
There could be a textdraw saying: you're now spying on ... fixing that.
Re: [Feature] /spy - Ben - 09-14-2008
Thats true. Im just not very keen due to my first point, I like being able to hide. But I guess im a minority voter d:
Re: [Feature] /spy - tomozj - 09-14-2008
(09-14-2008, 07:55 PM)Ben link Wrote: But I guess im a minority voter d:
Maybe I can help you. This takes GM-side features too far, as I believe GTA should be GTA without having to worry about people using ub3r l33t h4x to watch you, regardless of cost. Administrators use it to catch cheaters and bug abusers, but who else? This would be an invasion of privacy - unfair.
Re: [Feature] /spy - Richard - 09-14-2008
Agreed with tj, it should stay crew only.