![]() |
|
[Serious Discussion] Religion - Printable Version +- Las Venturas Playground (https://forum.sa-mp.nl) +-- Forum: Miscellaneous (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: General Talk (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-24.html) +--- Thread: [Serious Discussion] Religion (/thread-26936.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
|
Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - Munch - 05-26-2011 (05-26-2011, 11:01 PM)Silent_Bob link Wrote: I don't see neglect as abuse, I see it as...neglect and well rape could be I guess, because you're forcing someone to do something against their will which of course will result in abuse but I don't see how neglect is considered abuse, you're not doing anything to them... You're not doing anything to them? If you neglect a child you're allowing them to starve and effectively letting them die. You're intentionally ignoring the child's basic needs to survive. It falls under child abuse (and animal abuse) and therefore is a form of abuse. Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - Silent_Bob - 05-27-2011 (05-26-2011, 11:07 PM)Munch link Wrote: You're not doing anything to them? If you neglect a child you're allowing them to starve and effectively letting them die. You're intentionally ignoring the child's basic needs to survive. I guess what I'm referring to is when it's just leaving the kid in a room for an hour or something, but yea, I guess if you completely neglect them then it would be, there was a family that got sent to jail for locking their grand kids in cages and neglecting them, or when people leave their kids in the car for an extended period of time on a hot day...but I wasn't really referring to more then an hour in a room playing or something... Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - Munch - 05-27-2011 (05-27-2011, 02:04 AM)Silent_Bob link Wrote: I guess what I'm referring to is when it's just leaving the kid in a room for an hour or something, but yea, I guess if you completely neglect them then it would be, there was a family that got sent to jail for locking their grand kids in cages and neglecting them, or when people leave their kids in the car for an extended period of time on a hot day...but I wasn't really referring to more then an hour in a room playing or something... Well that's not neglect if they're in a room on their own for an hour or whatever, that's just parents or carers giving them some space and freedom. When kids get ignored and don't get fed, while the parents or carers are feeding their addictions or whatever they find more important than their kids, that's neglect, which is abuse. It's not physical, or sexual, but still abuse. Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - Gladiat0R - 05-27-2011 (05-26-2011, 10:55 PM)Silent_Bob link Wrote: I do believe I said current...and Guantanamo has nothing to do with religion whatsoever. And Munch, the reason I said that was because I consider abuse when you hit/beat up someone. Well then the 11/9 has nothing to do with religion too. Or terrorism. Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - [SAE]Grim - 05-27-2011 (05-27-2011, 11:44 AM)Gladiat0R link Wrote: Well then the 11/9 has nothing to do with religion too. Or terrorism. Dude, 9/11 didnt happen, it was only lies and manipulation presented by the media Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - MidNight - 05-27-2011 58 pages already, every page the same shit: Guy1: NO DIS IZ TRU!!11 N UR NOT SAYING DE TRU STUPED!!!1111 Guy2: NO U!111! Guy1: IZ TRU N I SHO U!!11 (brings proves/arguments of religion n stuff) Guy2: LIEZ!!11 (brings proves/arguments of atheism) Guy1: U STUPED DATS NOT TRU!!11 Guy2: NO U!111 And this repeats continiously wtf ppl you wont prove anyone here what he should belive in. if you didnt growen up in belief and wasnt educated in religion, ofcourse you wont belive because you simple cant understand it. Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - [SAE]Grim - 05-27-2011 Remove the "because you simple cant understand it." and I'll agree with you. Thats an opinion or statement / argument so if u wanna stay neutral (as to what the rest of ur posted showed) skip that.
Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - 0Target0 - 05-27-2011 You can't prove what does not exist. Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - Bloodst3r - 05-27-2011 MidNight, it's 58 pages and probably will expand more because it's obvious that no one will get convinced with anything but what he think of. it's more like of sharing religious point of views now, the discussion would be even better if people cut out the irony and stop trying to be funny though. Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - STyL4 - 05-27-2011 (05-27-2011, 03:22 PM)0Target0 link Wrote: You can't prove what does not exist. and if you could wrap ur minds around God you would be God
|