![]() |
|
CT's Vs BA's "LVP NEWS" - Printable Version +- Las Venturas Playground (https://forum.sa-mp.nl) +-- Forum: Miscellaneous (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: General Talk (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-24.html) +--- Thread: CT's Vs BA's "LVP NEWS" (/thread-7755.html) |
Re: CT's Vs BA's "LVP NEWS" - Darkfire - 04-06-2008 (04-06-2008, 01:10 AM)Jay link Wrote: B&A can't skit anyone for recruiting, because the people B&A Recruit it a lot worse than what ColdThugZ recruit. If B&A recruit only bad people, like I think you point to, and CT only recruit good people.. Ehm, why do CT lose..? Re: CT's Vs BA's "LVP NEWS" - Turkey - 04-06-2008 B&A was stronger than CT. I don't really remember losing that much wars vs CT so it was even. Well, but I'd also agree if you'd say it was unfair CT vs B&A//OnB. But you also had allies like the SnakeZ if I remember right. Let's not forget the uzi bug back in 0.1 which CT used. They all were good gangs for their times imo. ![]() As someone said, CT should be organized better to keep it alive this time.
Re: CT's Vs BA's "LVP NEWS" - Maka - 04-06-2008 (04-06-2008, 09:38 AM)Turkey link Wrote: Let's not forget the uzi bug back in 0.1 which CT used. Ahh them good old times <3 SA:MP 0.1b was just tha shit. Re: CT's Vs BA's "LVP NEWS" - DCreations - 04-06-2008 (04-06-2008, 09:48 AM)Makaveli link Wrote: Ahh them good old times <3 old times where fun hehe sa-mp 0.1 was crazy CT and SNakeZ where the shit well it still is
Re: CT's Vs BA's "LVP NEWS" - Rien - 04-06-2008 so errr... ColdThugz is back now?
Re: CT's Vs BA's "LVP NEWS" - HaZe - 04-06-2008 uzi bug was all about lead aim, it was a fair tactic. i remember people complained nonstop lol. Re: CT's Vs BA's "LVP NEWS" - Ben - 04-06-2008 From that entire picture i can only see two people who were in ColdThugZ. Jay and Chanster Re: CT's Vs BA's "LVP NEWS" - User1234567 - 04-06-2008 (04-06-2008, 07:13 PM)benbmyers link Wrote: From that entire picture i can only see two people who were in ColdThugZ. Jay and ChansterNo all the people on the pics are in CT because they have been recruitin. Re: CT's Vs BA's "LVP NEWS" - Fry - 04-06-2008 (04-05-2008, 04:01 AM)HaZe link Wrote: no one complains about a 1 man difference. CT would've still lost if the teams were even.Are you fucking serious? That's not at all what I was pointing out. You didn't even notice his comments? Re: CT's Vs BA's "LVP NEWS" - HaZe - 04-06-2008 (04-06-2008, 07:48 PM)Fry link Wrote: Are you fucking serious? That's not at all what I was pointing out.can you chill the hell out.. i didnt insult you or try to make you look dumb. |