+- Las Venturas Playground (https://forum.sa-mp.nl)
+-- Forum: Main Talk (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: Gangs (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-22.html)
+--- Thread: <Skilled 2 Kill> [S2K] (/thread-17472.html)
Re: <Skilled 2 Kill> [S2K] - Pilf - 05-08-2009
(05-08-2009, 07:59 PM)Hitman link Wrote: Indeed you never saw me ingame, i didnt play samp more than 1-3 times the last 3-4 weeks.. thats because i got the Orange Box some weeks ago and played TF2, and then FateTrip buying me Left 4 Dead last weekend made me get a no-lifer on other games, but im pretty sure that i take you down without the training.Lol
I don´t SAMP So much, because of TF2 too 
Re: <Skilled 2 Kill> [S2K] - weeyin - 05-08-2009
(05-08-2009, 07:35 PM)HoogerBooger link Wrote: If S2K is bad then HC4L is even worse. Remember folks, S2K owned HC4L in a fair fight. Also NiP.i think you should retract that statement cause i dont remember being owned by S2K
Re: <Skilled 2 Kill> [S2K] - Ph03n1x - 05-08-2009
(05-08-2009, 08:10 PM)weeyin link Wrote: i think you should retract that statement cause i dont remember being owned by S2K
(04-28-2009, 07:32 PM)SoNiX link Wrote: ok FORFEIT we won, you can reapply for other cw.
(04-28-2009, 07:38 PM)weeyin link Wrote: well i aint taking any blame for it, i was there
(04-28-2009, 07:40 PM)LucaSsCoTT link Wrote: Uh , Dude that its dream , You Win Cuz Its FOREIT ,
Mafo and midget were offline , [actually Mafo was online]
Its not be the last will have more , be sure in that
(04-28-2009, 10:01 PM)DeLiC link Wrote: 5-0 yall.
=]
Re: <Skilled 2 Kill> [S2K] - Maddolis - 05-09-2009
There will always be newbies biting off more than they can chew, it's a fact of life.
Re: <Skilled 2 Kill> [S2K] - FriZerra - 05-09-2009
(05-08-2009, 07:56 PM)Ph03n1x link Wrote: [me=Ph03n1x]stamps on the oldfags' toes and ballsacks.[/me]
who the f*ck u think u are ?
are u some kinda respected reputed barbarian ?
oh NoeS...stop bragging KiD !
Re: <Skilled 2 Kill> [S2K] - azerty - 05-09-2009
(05-08-2009, 07:56 PM)Ph03n1x link Wrote: [me=Ph03n1x]stamps on the oldfags' toes and ballsacks.werent you the guy that i owned with 80%armor left when i was barely playing samp ?
Re: <Skilled 2 Kill> [S2K] - Munch - 05-09-2009
(05-08-2009, 08:16 PM)Ph03n1x link Wrote: =]
uhm...phoenix mate, you can't call a forfeit win 'owning' them...yes you had a fight afterwards, but quoting SoNiX saying you lot beat them with a forfeit is not owning last I checked. Now that you're low on members, you should have enough for a war, even with some NiP inactive, so have one with them, and if you win, then you will have an excuse to say you owned them.
Re: <Skilled 2 Kill> [S2K] - [W]TR1pin - 05-09-2009
(05-09-2009, 11:35 AM)Munch link Wrote: uhm...phoenix mate, you can't call a forfeit win 'owning' them...yes you had a fight afterwards, but quoting SoNiX saying you lot beat them with a forfeit is not owning last I checked. Now that you're low on members, you should have enough for a war, even with some NiP inactive, so have one with them, and if you win, then you will have an excuse to say you owned them.
(05-08-2009, 07:35 PM)HoogerBooger link Wrote: If S2K is bad then HC4L is even worse. Remember folks, S2K owned HC4L in a fair fight. Also NiP.
Hooger said that, then Ph0NiX or w/e went on with it.
Re: <Skilled 2 Kill> [S2K] - HoogerBooger - 05-09-2009
(05-08-2009, 08:10 PM)weeyin link Wrote: i think you should retract that statement cause i dont remember being owned by S2K
I remember 5-0 ouch.
Re: <Skilled 2 Kill> [S2K] - LilJoN - 05-09-2009
(05-09-2009, 11:36 AM)TR1pin link Wrote: Hooger said that, then Ph0NiX or w/e went on with it.Ph03NiX