LVP vs. LW (Walk Weapons) team

LVP vs. LW (Walk Weapons) team - Printable Version

+- Las Venturas Playground (https://forum.sa-mp.nl)
+-- Forum: Main Talk (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: Las Venturas Playground (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-9.html)
+--- Thread: LVP vs. LW (Walk Weapons) team (/thread-23592.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Re: LVP vs. LW (Walk Weapons) team - LuKz - 05-29-2010

ill like to try out for this torni

where and when ^

Re: LVP vs. LW (Walk Weapons) team - iLz.12 - 05-29-2010

i can be in if i am needed, im good at ww, but choose players which won't play for rw team, anyways, nick -> iLz.12 / iLz.tHO

Re: LVP vs. LW (Walk Weapons) team - j.king - 05-29-2010

(05-28-2010, 01:40 PM)HoogerBooger link Wrote:Hey why not getting rid of all the restrictions regarding the number of players, let's just see which side can gather more players and let the shootout begin. Like a proper war. No need for this gay clanwar bollocks.

Thats just stupid, the event is to see which server regulars can work best as a team and as a result win. Not to go around getting fps/high pingers/people with hard hb's and let them play.

At the end of the day it's your decision.

Re: LVP vs. LW (Walk Weapons) team - ScottE - 05-29-2010

A few questions:

- How many members per team?
- How many rounds will the match consist of?
- Will it be A/D or TDM? TDM with first to reach a score or last team standing?
- What will the ping limit be?

Re: LVP vs. LW (Walk Weapons) team - IDmad - 05-31-2010

hmm since darius gave up on this we have 3 options:

1. Someone else takes the responsibility to make a ww lineup for LVP.

2. If noone wants to do it then we won't fight with walking weapons at all.

3. We won't do the match at all.

I hope someone who's good at ww's would make the lineup for LVP.

(05-29-2010, 07:55 PM)ScottE link Wrote:A few questions:

- How many members per team?
- How many rounds will the match consist of?
- Will it be A/D or TDM? TDM with first to reach a score or last team standing?
- What will the ping limit be?

Was supposed to be something like this:

-10vs10

-probably something like 5 rounds of rw and 5 rounds of ww or more depending what the players think and how long they want to play.

-TDM since A/D isn't really a thing from neither server. With last man standing like on both of the last matches.

-400 or smthing so that everyone can play. Only ppl with really high pings (450+) aren't allowed since u can't really explain that with ur location.

Re: LVP vs. LW (Walk Weapons) team - HoldeN - 05-31-2010

If no one else wants to do it, i will, only as the last person tho, if anyone else wants to take on the role, go ahead

IDmad, maybe you can copy and paste the participants into another topic, and then make a vote for it?

Re: LVP vs. LW (Walk Weapons) team - ExoticBud - 05-31-2010

Reserves pls

Re: LVP vs. LW (Walk Weapons) team - ScottE - 05-31-2010

(05-31-2010, 01:58 AM)IDmad link Wrote:-10vs10

Alright, cool. We got 10 member lists for both teams. I was a bit confused cause at some point there were 11 members in LVP's list. It's no problem 1 more or one less though.

(05-31-2010, 01:58 AM)IDmad link Wrote:-probably something like 5 rounds of rw and 5 rounds of ww or more depending what the players think and how long they want to play.

Sounds good.

(05-31-2010, 01:58 AM)IDmad link Wrote:-TDM since A/D isn't really a thing from neither server. With last man standing like on both of the last matches.

I guess you're right, would be fun to do A/D but it doesn't rly have much to do with either servers yeah. Last man standing sounds fine, was it also like that in RW?

(05-31-2010, 01:58 AM)IDmad link Wrote:-400 or smthing so that everyone can play. Only ppl with really high pings (450+) aren't allowed since u can't really explain that with ur location.

Great, you saved me some time of removing one or two 300 pinger's.

I have another question; how many spectators? I'd like to keep it low to avoid lagg.

Re: LVP vs. LW (Walk Weapons) team - IDmad - 06-01-2010

(05-31-2010, 03:37 AM)H0lden link Wrote:If no one else wants to do it, i will, only as the last person tho, if anyone else wants to take on the role, go ahead

IDmad, maybe you can copy and paste the participants into another topic, and then make a vote for it?

yea sure since noone else ain't gonna make it u can do it instead. Just make another thread and add ppl who wanna fight and who u think are good enough to the list. An admin could lock this topic please.

(05-31-2010, 07:18 PM)ScottE link Wrote:Alright, cool. We got 10 member lists for both teams. I was a bit confused cause at some point there were 11 members in LVP's list. It's no problem 1 more or one less though.

Yea and it's always good to have substitutes and ofc u can change the lineup between rounds so everyone gets a chance to play.

(05-31-2010, 07:18 PM)ScottE link Wrote:I guess you're right, would be fun to do A/D but it doesn't rly have much to do with either servers yeah. Last man standing sounds fine, was it also like that in RW?

yea A/D is more of a clanwar thing and it's not in either LW nor LVP gamemode so what's the point putting it into the match? It'd only show the skills of players who've been practicing A/D for ages and not the skills of "normal" LW/LVP players.

(05-31-2010, 07:18 PM)ScottE link Wrote:I have another question; how many spectators? I'd like to keep it low to avoid lagg.

yea as low as possible to avoid lag. Was thinking about 3-5 ppl for referees who'd watch that ppl don't start doing any illegal bugs (2 shot etc.) and 2-3 ppl to film the match. Referees and filmers could use jetpacks etc unless slice is gonna make some spectating system. Then maybe 5-10 VIP spectators (management from both servers if they're interested) and a few substitutes. That'd make about 30-40 ppl in total which I think is alright. In last match there was around 50-60 players if I remember right and it did lag a bit so I think lowering the player amount with 10-20 could help a bit. So yea there won't be many places for "normal" spectators so if u wanna be there u either need to be a referee (have knowledge of sa-mp's bugs) or be a filmer (having a good comp so that the film won't come up too laggy). Hope I cleared some things.

Re: LVP vs. LW (Walk Weapons) team - LasTRace - 06-01-2010

This list... almost all of them (not all) dont play at lvp...