![]() |
|
The Veauty Of Mathematicks! - Printable Version +- Las Venturas Playground (https://forum.sa-mp.nl) +-- Forum: Miscellaneous (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: General Talk (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-24.html) +--- Thread: The Veauty Of Mathematicks! (/thread-10522.html) |
Re: The Veauty Of Mathematicks! - [UvH]Hitman - 07-28-2008 (07-28-2008, 06:39 AM)Maddolis link Wrote: Actually, what Peter said was, believe it or not, correct. Nah, maddolis! WRONG! You all forgot to leave the 9 out. Epic fail madd ![]() its: x = 0.99999 then are 10x = 9.9999 ( not 9.99999, as you said) so then: 10x -x = 9.9999 - 0.99999 9x = 8.99991 x = 0.99999 ![]() May the fail be with you Re: The Veauty Of Mathematicks! - Maddolis - 07-28-2008 Quote:Hitman link=topic=11321.msg131550#msg131550 date=1217253549] a) I'm not wrong. . b) I didn't say 0.9999 nor 0.99999, its 0.9 Notice the . on top of the 9? That means 0.999999... AKA 0.99999(continue 9s here infinitely). Peter's working is correct, as is mine. Re: The Veauty Of Mathematicks! - [UvH]Hitman - 07-28-2008 okay, did not know how you show infinite numbers ![]() we in germany put an _ obove the 9. this: _ 9.999 Re: The Veauty Of Mathematicks! - Maddolis - 07-28-2008 Quote:Hitman link=topic=11321.msg131572#msg131572 date=1217256926] Same kind of deal, a _ over the number would mean its repeated. We can also put . over the number if its a single number, but if its 2+ numbers (eg 0.131313 or 54.254254254 etc) then we need the _ over them. Re: The Veauty Of Mathematicks! - [UvH]Hitman - 07-28-2008 (07-28-2008, 04:00 PM)Maddolis link Wrote: Same kind of deal, a _ over the number would mean its repeated. Chuck has spoken. Re: The Veauty Of Mathematicks! - Sammo - 07-28-2008
Re: The Veauty Of Mathematicks! - SidVicious - 07-28-2008 The first post was very clever and cool. It was kinda spoiled by the silly "God" reference though... Quote:IDmad link=topic=11321.msg129931#msg129931 date=1216734781] 'Cos 0.99999 .... (recurring) IS equal to 1 when we the recursion is infinite... Essentially Peter's post could have been boiled down to Quote:1 = 0.9999... (recurring). It illustrates the idea of infinitesimally small decrements, i.e., 1 minus an infinitesimally small number is equal to 0.9999... (recurring). If you subtract an infinitesimally small number from another number it hasn't actually changed and is therefore still equal to the original number... Re: The Veauty Of Mathematicks! - Maddolis - 07-29-2008 (07-28-2008, 09:04 PM)SidVicious link Wrote: The first post was very clever and cool. It was kinda spoiled by the silly "God" reference though... Infinitely small LIKE YOUR PENIS! Oohhhhh below the belt! Over the line! Cmon, show me what you got Sid! Re: The Veauty Of Mathematicks! - SidVicious - 07-29-2008 (07-29-2008, 07:54 AM)Maddolis link Wrote: Infinitely small LIKE YOUR PENIS! Your mom liked it. Re: The Veauty Of Mathematicks! - Maddolis - 07-29-2008 (07-29-2008, 04:30 PM)SidVicious link Wrote: Your mom liked it. Yours did too. Ooohhh! Another, another! |