+- Las Venturas Playground (https://forum.sa-mp.nl)
+-- Forum: Miscellaneous (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: General Talk (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-24.html)
+--- Thread: [Serious Discussion] Religion (/thread-26936.html)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - [SAE]Grim - 04-08-2011
LMFAO this is so hilarious xD
I mean what the hell lol!! Styla all u do is "u fail" "bad argument" "worse debater" bla bla bla, ur one clueless tard u know that
And I am pretty damn sure Target knows more about the bible than you do rofl
And I think you should go look up what "Proof" means, as you obviously havent come up with ANY proof yet.
Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - durrrrr - 04-08-2011
(04-08-2011, 07:02 PM)STyL4 link Wrote: i have to do everything for u since u didnt do nothing? well obviously because u guys are just asking, im answering..Don't go mad. You should know that if you want to debate, you have to give arguments for everything you state. Since you gave me no proofs, I don't take your words seriously (about radio waves and planes in the Bible).
just go like 2 pages from here and see solid proofs, and i also explained them briefly and no , i wont come to ur country just to do that for u. but there are those verses 100 % and if u get me lying then go on and post proofs, i'll eat my words then
WLproxy, nice arguments, too bad u just replied with complete shame without knowing anything about what we're talking about.
And it's not me, who has to deny the God/Bible/verses - it's you, who has to prove them.
Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - STyL4 - 04-08-2011
i gave u clearly demanded statements, all u did is reject them or ignore them like Grim because he had nothing back to say(just look at the pages previous, he was either spechless or said something completely random) - i gave u wonders of the Bible which obviously could not be denied, about radio waves and planes they're 100 % in the Bible just give me some time to find them, Bible is big u know.
"And I am pretty damn sure Target knows more about the bible than you do rofl" - doing opinions while not knowing(just to defend his side) - obviously going off-topic due to his loss on this debate
same with flaming and so on.. obviously u did not provide me replies just ur own opinion, get it in ur head. u were spechless or didnt reply the theme, thats what i always do, u change it because u r weak on specific subject.
if you could wrap your minds around God you would be God, get this into ur head.
Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - [SAE]Grim - 04-08-2011
(04-08-2011, 08:32 PM)STyL4 link Wrote: like Grim because he had nothing back to say(just look at the pages previous, he was either spechless or said something completely random)
(04-08-2011, 08:32 PM)STyL4 link Wrote: obviously going off-topic due to his loss on this debate
Are you trolling or are u just that stupid?
If anything I've made more constructive posts than u have so far in this thread, I wouldn't call it losing a debate (me losing) when everyone in this thread disagrees with you. The last pages I've said mostly everything I mean about religion, without targeting you, and you not getting my point is not my problem at all. You're coming up with bullshit I dont wanna spend time to "prove" or "disprove", I can say what I mean without having to prove anything, compared to you.
You're turning this whole thread to "[Serious Discussion] Religion versus Styla"
Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - STyL4 - 04-08-2011
everyone disagrees? ure brainwashed, u do what the "bigger" community does. u know, if "everyone would agree" on that, then we wouldnt evolve at all, and the truth would remain hidden, just look at the history talking and it's revelations and new discoveries. typical excuse #1. i find it funny, because Scientists like Isaac Newton didnt bother what sceptics said, but Americans(yes, there are the most Atheists like u) argues, but is it worth fighting for nothing? well yea, in ur kind of view that's how u do it. Fight for "existance" of "nothing".
"If anything I've made more constructive posts than u have so far in this thread, I wouldn't call it losing a debate (me losing) when everyone in this thread disagrees with you. The last pages I've said mostly everything I mean about religion, without targeting you, and you not getting my point is not my problem at all. You're coming up with bullshit I dont wanna spend time to "prove" or "disprove", I can say what I mean without having to prove anything, compared to you. " - more constructive? i provided loads of materials with solid proof, explain materials. can u explain ORCH - OR? any of you can? You CANT, ORCH - OR is a solid proof, and dont say it isnt. youre just changing the theme over and over again and avoiding my videos. what you did was just state your OPINION, you should google what "facts" are. always got ur point, always replied ur replies as u could tell, theres no problem at my side at all.
Quantum God Episode Two: Properties of the Universal Orch-OR
its a typical "you use bullshit" excuse, going agressive on the debater winning.
Quote:Grim link=topic=28190.msg382085#msg382085 date=1302291696]- typical example of not following the debate theme, im for Religion here and pretty much sucessful
You're turning this whole thread to "[Serious Discussion] Religion versus Styla"
obviously u cannot even state ur opinion because as we can see u do not even follow the theme. ur anger obviously started giving ur own opinions with no facts provided and now yet again u will start another post, with NEW theme(typical "starting new theme" to avoid the previous one due to missing details of urs) and state nothing but ur own opinion(its in ur own post).combine ontological argument with parallel universes like i did with the video.
Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - [SAE]Grim - 04-08-2011
How exactly am I starting a new "theme"? I'm not responding your replies because they dont interest me, but you think this whole thread is about ur personal religious view so u start attacking everyone who says something.
I'm talking about religious views in general, from an atheists viewpoint, and then u come bashing in with videos and all sorts of crap trying to prove me wrong, when I havent even written something with proof in it.
There are many forms of discussions and the only one you're using is the fact vs fact one, wich gets quite irritatin at times and shows your lack of knowledge in "debating". The only thing you have done so far is coming with religious videos where they use science to prove things in the bible. You have not gone into a deeper discussion about your belief in religion at all, wich makes me think you're rather clueless.
Religion is about faith, and trying to prove the bible through science is a battle you will never win, and u most certainly wont ever make any of us convinced. The only people you are convincing are the ones who already are religious. Notice how all ur video's comments are from religious people?
And no im not brainwashed, I've stated my viewpoints without help from other ppl in this thread and they disagreeing with you is a clear fact, that has nothing to do with me.
But it's cute you think you're such a great debater placing urself much higher than anyone else in the thread, claiming everything they come up with is "bad" or "typical excuses" and so on.
Maybe it's time to realise you're not right about everything?
Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - STyL4 - 04-08-2011
"I'm talking about religious views in general, from an atheists viewpoint, and then u come bashing in with videos and all sorts of crap trying to prove me wrong, when I havent even written something with proof in it. " - uve never written anything with proof, just ur personal view.
"How exactly am I starting a new "theme"? I'm not responding your replies because they dont interest me" - then dont call it a debate and dont even say that there are personal religious views in my thread because obviously ure not following(at all).
"There are many forms of discussions and the only one you're using is the fact vs fact one, wich gets quite irritatin at times and shows your lack of knowledge in "debating". The only thing you have done so far is coming with religious videos where they use science to prove things in the bible. " - more likely fact vs opinion, doesnt really shows lack of knowledge in debating because debate relies on proofs, its not about "mouth" only.
"You have not gone into a deeper discussion about your belief in religion at all, wich makes me think you're rather clueless." - first u state i use personal religious view, now u state i havent gone into depper discussion about MY belief? hmmmm
"Religion is about faith, and trying to prove the bible through science is a battle you will never win, and u most certainly wont ever make any of us convinced. The only people you are convincing are the ones who already are religious. Notice how all ur video's comments are from religious people? " - they are disliked by atheists and atheists will never win they battle because as stated, they are fighting for "nothing" in their belief, existance of nothing. but in my belif, i always get my reward at the end of the day, dont u worry.
"And no im not brainwashed, I've stated my viewpoints without help from other ppl in this thread and they disagreeing with you is a clear fact, that has nothing to do with me.
But it's cute you think you're such a great debater placing urself much higher than anyone else in the thread, claiming everything they come up with is "bad" or "typical excuses" and so on.
Maybe it's time to realise you're not right about everything? " - what can be better than stating ORCH - OR , connecting it with God and quantum mechanics. disprove.
Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - [SAE]Grim - 04-08-2011
(04-08-2011, 09:39 PM)STyL4 link Wrote: "How exactly am I starting a new "theme"? I'm not responding your replies because they dont interest me" - then dont call it a debate
Srsly..
(04-08-2011, 09:39 PM)STyL4 link Wrote: and dont even say that there are personal religious views in my thread because obviously ure not following(at all).Sorry didnt know it was your thread, I'll leave at once.
Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - STyL4 - 04-08-2011
nice reply
Srsly..
Quote:Grim link=topic=28190.msg382085#msg382085 date=1302291696]obvious sarcasm.
You're turning this whole thread to "[Serious Discussion] Religion versus Styla"
Re: [Serious Discussion] Religion - Silent_Bob - 04-08-2011
(04-08-2011, 09:02 PM)STyL4 link Wrote: everyone disagrees? ure brainwashed, u do what the "bigger" community does. u know, if "everyone would agree" on that, then we wouldnt evolve at all, and the truth would remain hidden, just look at the history talking and it's revelations and new discoveries. typical excuse #1. i find it funny, because Scientists like Isaac Newton didnt bother what sceptics said, but Americans(yes, there are the most Atheists like u) argues, but is it worth fighting for nothing? well yea, in ur kind of view that's how u do it. Fight for "existance" of "nothing".
ROFL
we're the ones who's brainwashed? we're the ones not believing in what a stupid books tells us to believe so if that's what you consider brainwashed then you're just an idiot. In America the majority of people are Christians or a variation of that so I do believe that being an atheist isn't doing what the majority is doing.