+- Las Venturas Playground (https://forum.sa-mp.nl)
+-- Forum: Miscellaneous (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: General Talk (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-24.html)
+--- Thread: Lay back on the signature limits! (/thread-8011.html)
Pages:
1
2
Re: Lay back on the signature limits! - Peter - 04-12-2008
You should realise what kind of impact specific suggestions have on the overall performance. Adding a small youtube/flash video to a signature can decrease the page-loading type with ~450 ms on average systems, which is an aweful amount (yes, it's highly noticeable -- the average visitor wants pages to load within 2 seconds, we're damn close to that already). Bold/coloured text is not required and will only emphasise the potential use of free advertising spots signatures have. Before we might even consider "relaxing" the limits, the entire html-tree of the forum would have to be reconsidered and a sufficient amount of optimalisations are required.
Right now, no. In the future, perhaps, but not soon.
Re: Lay back on the signature limits! - [NB]ExPloiTeD - 04-12-2008
(04-12-2008, 01:42 PM)Peter link Wrote: You should realise what kind of impact specific suggestions have on the overall performance. Adding a small youtube/flash video to a signature can decrease the page-loading type with ~450 ms on average systems, which is an aweful amount (yes, it's highly noticeable -- the average visitor wants pages to load within 2 seconds, we're damn close to that already). Bold/coloured text is not required and will only emphasise the potential use of free advertising spots signatures have. Before we might even consider "relaxing" the limits, the entire html-tree of the forum would have to be reconsidered and a sufficient amount of optimalisations are required.
Right now, no. In the future, perhaps, but not soon.
the god has spoken!!!!!!
Re: Lay back on the signature limits! - Sammo - 04-12-2008
Lol :7
Re: Lay back on the signature limits! - Danny - 04-13-2008
I think nothing should change, apart from: You are allowed more 'sig' in your 'sigs'
If you get what I's saying
